Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rick.Donaldson
That’s in the FCC regs. So, it isn’t stealing if I leave my stuff open.

Whether it's stealing solely depends on your intent, and it's up to the other person to determine that. Leaving WiFi open for your neighbors is getting popular, and routers have been made that have two firewalled sides for your security, one for you and one for the free WiFi you're providing, both using the same broadband connection. I believe the British phone company is even encouraging people to have open WiFi so there will be more coverage for mobile devices.

This will drive the RIAA and others nuts when it gets more popular, as going by the IP address (if using NAT) would mean nothing anymore.

But when that's popular we will have to have a shift in thinking and law to what the author thinks: leaving it open is implicit license to use it. We already do this for the private property most of us visit every day, such as stores and restaurants. If we don't do this you could accidentally break the law 20 times by driving down the road with your iPhone.

81 posted on 01/07/2008 11:57:36 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat
Whether it's stealing solely depends on your intent, and it's up to the other person to determine that.

Yeah, I know, that's sort of what I was trying to say.

If I leave it open, it isn't stealing. If I am following FCC regulations and doing what I am legally required to do, it's not stealing. I CAN take certain steps to PREVENT connections though, so I would do this.
91 posted on 01/07/2008 12:14:15 PM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson