Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BradtotheBone
Excellent analogy. Receiving public transmissions should not be illegal as long as they are not secured.

we are not arguing about RECEIVING, it's TRANSMITTING over someone else's network that is the problem.

175 posted on 01/07/2008 3:17:45 PM PST by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Wil H
we are not arguing about RECEIVING, it's TRANSMITTING over someone else's network that is the problem.

It's a problem both ways. Unauthorized interception of communications is illegal. You can't effectively steal bandwidth unless a transmission is involved as the communications protocols demand activity in each direction. Most devices with an integrated Wi-Fi device have a means of disabling it. That is a requirement to operate the device on an aircraft. Enabling the device without prior authorization to connect to a network is an intentional act.

179 posted on 01/07/2008 3:55:58 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson