To: Petronski
The acrimony toward Mitt that has been displayed here on FR.com over the last year has certainly intensified during the past couple of weeks.
That is OK with me. Reasonable people will sometimes display acrimony.
Debating the intricacies of a health care plan mandated by Government suggests that there is probably a GOOD health care plan mandated by Government.
IMO, there is not.
These threads are not about health care plan intricacies. They are simply about finding new and innovative ways for slamming a candidate that one does not approve of.
It is shameful that FR.com is being reduced to a never ending onslaught of ad hominem attacks on a particular REPUBLICAN candidate.
It is just not something that I ever thought I’d see on Free Republic.
178 posted on
01/06/2008 4:44:05 PM PST by
Radix
(If your outgo exceeds your income, your upkeep will be your downfall.)
To: Radix
You’re right, it’s the mandate, period.
186 posted on
01/06/2008 5:09:40 PM PST by
gidget7
( Vote for the Arsenal of Democracy, because America RUNS on Duncan!)
To: Radix
The reason Mitt is being questioned and suspect is that he is a Liberal.
Mitt supporters are delusional to think that he is conservative, and since FreeRepublic is a conservative form, Mitt deserves any criticism that he gets.
How dare liberals come here on FR and take over the discussions and think that they own FR and spew their liberal ideas and promote their liberal candidates, if you want your candidate to get good press, then go to the DNC or the Democrat party, not here.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson