[Radix]

"He could have vetoed it."

In all fairness, Mitt's veto was proven useless here.

Should he have vetoed on principle? Perhaps.

It would not have made a difference.

I am against the health care mandate altogether, so the point is moot.

[trisham]

In all fairness, Mitt's veto was proven useless here. Should he have vetoed on principle? Perhaps. It would not have made a difference.

****************

I was willing to cut Romney a lot of slack when he was here, but I disagree with the above. Yes, he should have vetoed on principle. However, his plans for a future run for the presidency precluded that.

[Petronski]

Should he have vetoed on principle? Perhaps.

Of course he should. What he DID was go along with a bloodthirsty court order, like a Good German.