Frank Luntz is on Fox predicting that Clinton will lose to Obama in New Hampshire.
He also thinks McCain will beat Romney...his reasoning is that the voters want change and do not want to go with the establishment. Anyone see a problem with his thinking here?
I think his meaning of anti-establishment - tax-cut, CFR, kyoto, terrorist-interrogation & many more.
Somebody made a comment earlier on one of the shows about how the candidates don't get to rest between Iowa and New Hampshire this year, and it's possible that Frnk Luntz needs some sleep as well.
He needed to say something, and somehow he decided that voting for John McCain would represent change for NH voters.
Sometimes the QB should just throw the ball out of bounds or take the sack. Luntz looks like he could use some time off.
He also thinks McCain will beat Romney...his reasoning is that the voters want change and do not want to go with the establishment. Anyone see a problem with his thinking here?
McCain IS part of the establishment and has been a Washington insider for years. How can they think that people believe he is the “change” candidate for the Republians? McCain is supported by the media and Washington insiders. Voters will not support him. If “change” is indeed what people want then Huck or Mitt will win the Rep nomination.