Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: topher

Their next step would be to take it federal.


28 posted on 01/04/2008 6:19:28 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Blood of Tyrants

They already did take it to federal court, and got turned down, six years ago.


32 posted on 01/04/2008 6:50:12 PM PST by kingu (Fred08 - The Constitution is the value I'm voting for. What value are you voting for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Nebraska , Lincoln 9.40.090

9.40.090 Focused Residential Picketing, Prohibited.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in focused picketing in that portion of any street
which abuts on the property upon which the targeted dwelling is located, or which abuts on property within
fifty feet (measured from the lot line) of the property upon which the targeted dwelling is located, except
the sidewalk space on the opposite side of the street from the targeted dwelling.
(b) For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) Focused picketing shall mean picketing directed toward a specific person or persons
including, but not limited to, marching, congregating, standing, parading, demonstrating, parking, or
patrolling by one or more persons, with or without signs.
(2) Sidewalk space shall mean that portion of a street between the curb line and the
adjacent property line.
(3) Street shall mean the entire width between the boundary lines of every way publicly
maintained when any part thereof is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel.
(4) Targeted dwelling shall mean any building or dwelling unit within a building, in which
the target or targets of focused picketing reside.
(c) This section shall not apply to any picketing, focused or otherwise, which lawfully occurs
before or about any commercial or industrial establishment or business, regardless of where located.
(d) This section shall not be construed to authorize conduct which is otherwise prohibited by law.
(Ord. 17164 §1; April 7, 1997).

****************************************************

Based on how it is written and the date on which it was adopted it appears that this code was written specifically for these 2 ladies..., it also appears that these ladies were well aware of being targeted and adjusted their meeting with the abortionist so as to not meet the conditions set forth in section “b1” ; based on “b1” it seems on the surface that this does not apply as their presence although timed to coincide with the abortionists arrival did not have them loitering in any way ...

Every activity in “b1” “marching, congregating, standing, parading, demonstrating, parking, or patrolling by one or more persons, with or without signs.” implies much more time on the premises.


33 posted on 01/04/2008 6:53:28 PM PST by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson