> “Your naked claim that Mr. Cryer is a liar is as worthless as you claim his web site to be.”
If you bother to actually look at my posts, I NEVER said Mr. Cryer was a liar. I said what he posted was one-sided. He is a lawyer. Being one sided is their business. I like to hear both sides before making any kind of a decision, especially one that could put me in jail.
I guess that your saying I called him a liar makes you a liar, right?
Not necessarily -- but it will do until you prove that what he put on his web site is inaccurate/worthless.
Let's put it this way: Then, if you like to hear both before making decisions tht is wise; but jumping to conclusions and alleging that he has deliberately misled others on his website BEFORE you have both sides (which you have admitted) then that makes you either a blow-hard fool or a liar -- or both.