Skip to comments.
Why have 36 states clung to a method of using 3 chemicals to execute prisoners?
Star Tribune ^
| January 2, 2008
| ADAM LIPTAK
Posted on 01/03/2008 7:25:32 AM PST by Sopater
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
"If you change," Denno said, "you're admitting there was something wrong with the prior method. All those people you were executing, you could have been doing it in a better, more humane way."
If it works there's probably nothing wrong with the current method. I'd put a complaint box in the room, and if the prisoner has an uncomfortable execution, he can fill out a complaint form and put it in the box.
1
posted on
01/03/2008 7:25:36 AM PST
by
Sopater
To: Sopater
Why indeed? A .45 to the back of the head works every time without fail. Cheaper.
2
posted on
01/03/2008 7:26:46 AM PST
by
MoMagic
To: Sopater
I prefer an "elemental" solution.
Pb
To: Sopater
We could always go back to hanging in the public square....we all know the founding fathers didn’t find that to be cruel and unusual. Hopefully the relatively “new” Supreme Court will do away with much of the Brandies mandated “balancing” tests relating to the death penalty, the Establishment Clause, the Freedom of Religion Clause, etc. I doubt it; but hey why not dream :D
4
posted on
01/03/2008 7:29:08 AM PST
by
IMissPresidentReagan
("When you can't make them see the light; make them feel the heat." President Ronald Reagan)
To: Sopater
A proven method:
5
posted on
01/03/2008 7:30:40 AM PST
by
JRios1968
(Don't mess with tigers, for you are crunchy and chewy...)
To: MoMagic
It doesn’t matter how they die, the real penalty is the wait. If we wanted to be humane we’d drug their dinner one random night and kill them in their sleep.
6
posted on
01/03/2008 7:32:37 AM PST
by
randog
(What the...?!)
To: Sopater
Weird just watched this on Law & Order last night about a women using the same chemicals on a right to die case. The lady involved in the right to die opposed the death penalty but still gave her sucidial patients the chemicals anyways.
To: Sopater
I have had general anesthesia several times. Painless - I just went to sleep - use those drugs to get the perp sedated and unconscious, then use the deadly stuff. No pain, no fuss, no problem.
8
posted on
01/03/2008 7:37:55 AM PST
by
MarkT
To: Santa Fe_Conservative
I saw that episode. I gotta say I really miss the guy who played Adam being DA or Fred Thompson being DA. I liked it better when Sam Watterston’s character was being smacked about by the head guy in charge. haha.
BTW did you hear the snide little throw-off on Fred? “This office isn’t a showroom anymore it’s a work room.” I by no means am an avid “Fred-head” but that comment just got under my skin.
It reminded me why I quit Law and Order after Jerry Orbach (I know I misspelled it :( ) left, and then passed away. I hate the Jack McCoy character, and ugh it’s awful now he’s the DA!
9
posted on
01/03/2008 7:38:18 AM PST
by
IMissPresidentReagan
("When you can't make them see the light; make them feel the heat." President Ronald Reagan)
To: randog
If we wanted to be humane wed drug their dinner one random night and kill them in their sleep.
If we were wanting justice, we'd invite the surviving relatives into a room and ask them what they want done -- give them 5 minutes to get it done.
10
posted on
01/03/2008 7:38:22 AM PST
by
MoMagic
To: Sopater
The one time I have witnessed the euthanasia of an older pet, the process was extremely rapid and I do not believe the animal could have felt any pain. I don’t understand why three chemicals are needed for human executions.
To: Sopater
12
posted on
01/03/2008 7:38:58 AM PST
by
toddlintown
(Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss..)
To: Sopater
Why not bring back the gas chamber and fill it with nitrogen? The perp would black out in seconds and check out 7 minutes later.
13
posted on
01/03/2008 7:40:37 AM PST
by
AU72
To: JRios1968
yes and its very handy in the kitchen too
14
posted on
01/03/2008 7:41:01 AM PST
by
al baby
(Hi mom)
To: JRios1968
Yes, I’ve often wondered why we don’t consider the guillotine. Is it the “image” problem?
15
posted on
01/03/2008 7:42:52 AM PST
by
Truth29
To: al baby
16
posted on
01/03/2008 7:44:19 AM PST
by
JRios1968
(Don't mess with tigers, for you are crunchy and chewy...)
To: Sopater
Why use 3 chemicals when you can use 1 bullet.
17
posted on
01/03/2008 7:48:04 AM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: MoMagic
If we want to really have justice, let the coldblooded killers be dispatched in a way similar to the crime, ie..child molesters and rapist-killers, throw them in a cage with a viagra enhanced deviant gorilla. Wow, after that was televised a few times I bet the rape and molestation cases would drop about 110%.
18
posted on
01/03/2008 7:50:09 AM PST
by
redstateconfidential
(If you are the smartest person in the room,you are hanging out with the wrong people.)
To: Sopater
"
Why have 36 states clung to a method of using 3 chemicals to execute prisoners?"
1) ... So the pharmaceutical companies will make a profit.
2) ... Rope made in China has too much lead.
3) ... Shooting them increases their carbon footprint.
4) ... One may not be enough, and four may be too much.
5) ... So they won't know which one will kill them.
6) ... George Bush.
7) ... To keep Huckabee from pardoning them.
8) ... They have a ten year supply of chemicals left.
9) ... The executioners are afraid of electricity.
10) ... To see if the coroner knows his suff.
19
posted on
01/03/2008 7:50:10 AM PST
by
G.Mason
(And what is intelligence if not the craft of out-thinking our adversaries?)
To: Sopater
If they give up on the current method without being forced to, something will be wrong with the replacement and they will be forced to give it up, ad infinitum.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson