Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Rising Sea Dragon in Asia (PLAN) - 2008 Update
The Rising Sea Dragon in Asia ^ | January 2, 2008 | Jeff Head

Posted on 01/01/2008 9:26:12 PM PST by Jeff Head

THE RISING SEA DRAGON IN ASIA - 2008 UPDATE
By Jeff Head - Last Update: January 2, 2008




Throughout 2007 the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has concentrated on integrating its newest surface combatants into its various fleets, while introducing new combatants simultaneously. In particularly, the newer nuclear attack and ballistic missile submarines have been officially seen and photographed, punctuating the PLAN's continued advance and improvement of its nuclear submarine capability, while continuing to build and add new diesel electric submarines. It's new Landing Ship Dock and now new, associated LCAC craft are being integrated into the fleet. The PLAN thus continues its unprecedented modernization and buildup integrating its new guided missile destroyers, guided missile frigates, fast attack craft, very modern and quiet diesel/electric attack submarines, nuclear attack submarines, nuclear ballistic missile


The new Type 051C, guided missiles destroyers have undergone sea trials and their pennant numbers have been added, 115 and 116 as they have joined the North Sea Fleet.



The new Type 071 LPD has been conducting sea trials. This is a significant addition to the PLAN, representing the largest amphibious vessel in their inventory and a very modern and capable design of which more are sure to be built. The vessle displaces 20-25,000 tons and is capable of both air assault and amphibious assault as the new LCAC craft which have now started appearing, and which are shown in the following photographs attest.



The PLAN has introduced a new LCAC design, clearly intended for their new Lanning Platform Dock. These are very similar in size and function to the US Navy's LCAC and appear capable of carrying at least one main battle tank or and assortment of other vehicles and troops. The LPD appears to be able to hold at least two, and perhaps three of these craft.




The new Type 054A guided missiles frigates have been undergoing sea trials. With their vertical launch missiles and heavier displacement and other improvements, they represent extremely modern and capable frigates. The east and south sea fleets will probably both benefit from these vessels, particularly as more are added.



The PLAN has offically recognized the existance of the new Type 093 nuclear attack submarine (SSN) and the Type 094 ballistic missile submarine (SSBN). The SSN appears to be roughly equivalent to a US Navy Los Angeles attack submarine in design and capability, and perhaps close to the advanced Los Angeles class. The SSBN carries 12 SLBMs, each with a range of several thousand kilometers. It cannot be over emphasized how critical these developments are in the relative sea power in the western Pacific, particularly as the PLAN builds more of these vessels. It is thought that at least two, and perhaps up to four new SSNs are already launched and through trials, while at least one, and perhaps two of the new SSBNs have been launched to date.



In the mean time, steady work continues on the Varyag, the full-deck aircraft carrier undergoing refit at the Dalian naval shipyards. Outside of finish work on the island, the deck and hull seem to be complete with unknown progress on the interior spaces, particularly the propulsion. Significant anticipation as to the launch date of this vessel is building, with some conjecture that it may be launched just before or during the Olympics shecdeuled in Beijing.





The PLAN, during this period, has shown a willingness and the capability to spend significant time and monies on training and integration exercises for its newly acquired vessels...all extremely critical in developing the expertise, policies, procedures, and doctrine for their growing modern navy.

Once again, by way of reference, it should be noted that in general numbers, over the last several years, the PLAN has built and launched over 80 new major surface combatants for its fleet. In that same time period, they have not decommissioned any major surface combatants, meaning they have added over 80 major surface combatant vessels to their inventory. In that same period, the US Navy has built 46 new major surface combatants. At the same time, the US Navy has decommissioned 49 major surface combatants, many of them with 10-15 years of service life remaining, meaning a net loss of three major surface combatants in this period.

Clearly the trend shows that the PLAN is rapidly closing the gap between itself and the US Navy, and particualrly when focusing on the Western Pacific, which is where the PLAN is concentrated, this is a trend worthy of watching and considering in future US Navy and other western nation's planning and acquisition schedules.





LINKS OF INTEREST
Jeff Head is an engineering consultant with many years experience in the power, defense, and computer industries. He currently works for the federal government helping maintain and protect regional infrastructure. He is a member of the U.S. Naval Institute, and is also the author of a self-published and best-selling series of military techno-thrillers called the Dragon's Fury that projects a fictional third world war arising out of current events. You can learn more about that series by clicking on the pictures of the novel covers below:


THE DRAGON'S FURY SERIES

Copyright © 2008 by Jeff Head


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: china; dragonsfury; dragonsfuryseries; duncanhunter; plan; redchinathreat; redseadragon; worldwariii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
For those following the growth and modernization of the Red Chinese Fleet (PLAN), here is my 2008 update.
1 posted on 01/01/2008 9:26:14 PM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joanie-f; Dukie; Squantos; JohnHuang2; RobFromGa; k.trujillo; Travis McGee; jim macomber; ...

FYI...my 2008 update.


2 posted on 01/01/2008 9:27:30 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

It does not give me the warm fuzzies


3 posted on 01/01/2008 9:30:45 PM PST by al baby (Hi mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby
They are rapidly, and consistantly building up their forces...and modernizing them very rapidly, quickly closing the gap with us which had been a good 25+ years in the late 90s and which now has shrunk to just a few years in many areas.

What they are doing in terms of shipbuilding is simply breathtaking and phenominal.

4 posted on 01/01/2008 9:33:42 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

A man (Jimmy Carter), a PLAN, a canal, Panama!


5 posted on 01/01/2008 9:34:56 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

The Type-054A frigates are what impresses me the most.These are relatively low cost & decently armed(don’t know about electronics/sensors) & could have the same success that the US OHP class or the French Lafayette have had as export platforms.More so,if they get manage to integrate European subsystems on it,like they are doing for Pakistan’s F-22P frigates.


6 posted on 01/01/2008 9:35:19 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Thanks for the ping!


7 posted on 01/01/2008 9:36:13 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Exactly...and now the Red Chinese are aligning themselves with every tin horn that opposes us (Iran, Venezuela, etc.)...no surprize there, but they are rapidly adding some muscle to it.

...and they are deeply into the canal and Panama, as well as numerous other places in Central and South America as well as the Carribean, Africa, and elsewhere.

8 posted on 01/01/2008 9:37:09 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Excellent work. Very scary stuff.


9 posted on 01/01/2008 9:37:54 PM PST by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/asia/article3298364.ece

2008: The year a new superpower (China) is born.


10 posted on 01/01/2008 9:38:06 PM PST by eekitsagreek (I'm nuts, NUTS I tell ya for Sprague Grayden!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

With our walmart purchase’s we better wake up


11 posted on 01/01/2008 9:38:08 PM PST by al baby (Hi mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: al baby
This does not give me the warm fuzzies!

U.S. carrier help? (Admiral offers help to China)

Adm. Tim Keating, the U.S. Pacific Command leader, told reporters during his visit to China last month that while building and operating a carrier battle group is complex, the United States is willing to help.

"We would, if they choose to develop [an aircraft-carrier program], help them to the degree that they seek and the degree that we're capable, in developing their programs," Adm. Keating said.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1845931/posts

U.S. may share missile info with China
WASHINGTON, June 4 (UPI) -- The United States would "seriously" consider sharing technology and missile warning intelligence with China, (Secretary of Defense Gates) the U.S. defense chief said Sunday.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1846099/posts

Some China firms avoid U.S. technology transfer licenses

WASHINGTON: Six months ago, the U.S. government quietly eased some restrictions on the export of sensitive technologies to China. The new approach was intended to help U.S. companies increase sales of high-technology equipment to China despite tight curbs on sharing technology that might have military applications.

But now the administration is facing questions from weapons experts about whether some equipment - newly authorized for export to Chinese companies deemed trustworthy by Washington - could instead end up helping China modernize its military. Equally worrisome, the weapons experts say, is the possibility that China could share the technology with Iran or Syria.

12 posted on 01/01/2008 9:39:03 PM PST by B4Ranch (( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
They are very impressive and by all accounts, look to be built in some numbers. Maybe 20-25 for the PLAN, plus who knows how many on the export market if they decide to export them.

I am still trying to track down the exact status of the SU-33 deal with the Chinese. I cannot find verification that the 1st two were delivered for study...but apparently those two, plus a couple of additional batches (12 and then like 36) have been tendered if the PLAN is interested.

13 posted on 01/01/2008 9:39:42 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Rebuilding the Varyag is one thing but building a viable carrier launched air wing is another. Since the Chinese are building amphibious warships, is there any chance the Varyag may be used for troop-carrying helicopters?
14 posted on 01/01/2008 9:40:43 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Some more China/US articles...

http://www.chinasecurity.us/News_View.asp?NewsID=81


15 posted on 01/01/2008 9:42:42 PM PST by eekitsagreek (I'm nuts, NUTS I tell ya for Sprague Grayden!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

“Clearly the trend shows that the PLAN is rapidly closing the gap between itself and the US Navy”

“The gap” is closing? So when they reach the same number of ships, they’ll be the U.S. Navy’s equal? And they’re just “a few years” behind us now?

If that’s true, we suck, and have for a long time. So do the Russians, and pretty well everyone else. It’s amazing that the Chinese will have managed to develop a peer navy within a few short years, whether it be in terms numerical, technological or operational. Truly, truly amazing.


16 posted on 01/01/2008 9:42:58 PM PST by Sandreckoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Olympics 2008

Taiwan 2009?


17 posted on 01/01/2008 9:43:04 PM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

And what do the ‘Rats think the Chinese are building these for? And at such a rapid rate? C’mon Hillary. Tell us. They’re your friends.


18 posted on 01/01/2008 9:43:41 PM PST by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (****************************Stop Continental Drift**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
They were offered the SU-33 from the Russians last year...up to 50 of them. My guess is, they will get some of them and then license build their own, like they are doing the SU-27 and perhaps the SU-30s. I also bet we see a navalized version fo the J-10 or its follow-on at some point.

Once the Varyag is complete, I also expect the PLAN to build two of their own carriers in fairly quick order...probably simultaneously like they have been doing with their other new major surface combatants.

19 posted on 01/01/2008 9:43:59 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: eekitsagreek

“2008: The year a new superpower (China) is born”

Link through from that article to their 2006 pieces and you’ll read that, truly, we are screwed. America is in decline, and will be eclipsed sooner or later by China, regardless of what we do. Just lay back and accept it as truth, and inevitable.


20 posted on 01/01/2008 9:44:10 PM PST by Sandreckoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson