To: discostu
Taken individually sure they can often be in error, but given the way the polls have been flying for the last 13 months, and given the consistency of the picture theyre painting down at the bottom end, they add up to fairly solid information on exactly who cannot win the election.
Do you mean like the rock solid polls that declared Thomas Dewey the winner over Harry Truman in the 1948 elections to the point of publishing it in the newspaper the day after the election? How about those always dependable exit polls that declared Al Gore the victor over Bush in the 2000 election? LOL!!!!
58 posted on
01/01/2008 8:26:48 PM PST by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! Duncan Hunter is a Cosponsor.)
To: Man50D
No, and if you’d bothered to actually read what I said you wouldn’t even have asked that stupid question as the quote already gave the answer.
61 posted on
01/01/2008 8:29:15 PM PST by
discostu
(a mountain is something you don't want to %^&* with)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson