 |
UK Ping list - if you would like on or off, freepmail me. |
Posted on 01/01/2008 11:15:53 AM PST by UKrepublican
| |
UK Ping list - if you would like on or off, freepmail me. |
PING
This is one more of a growing number of posts about once-great Britain that make me think this is the most f*’d up country in the Western World.
The government should have tried to collect the woman first. The falsely accused man could sue her in civil court. The woman probably has no assets, so it will come to nothing. I also thought it interesting that the newspaper never gives the name of the woman. Why the protection of a criminal. Is she going to be charged with anything?
at first I thought this was going to be a story about the accuser being ordered to pay the cost but then I realized it was Britain.
What about the woman? Did she go to jail? Get fined? Why aren’t they making her pay this?
And as soon as they get 12 more muslims there, it won’t even be able to be called part of the “Western World”.
The woman was a serial accuser? What the hell was his lawyer doing the whole time to have that slip past him/her?
Just a matter of time.
For those who might not realize it, the upper house of Parliament, the House of Lords, used to be independent of the Commons, and while it had far less power, it did have a certain amount of power to block or delay bad legislation.
Tony Blair basically eviscerated the House of Lords during his time in office, partly because they tried to block his bill that lowered the age of consent for homosexual acts with minors, and partly because Labour has always hated the idea of a hereditary peerage.
So, this House of Lords that denied relief from this unjust procedure was basically Tony Blair's House of Lords, appointed mostly from former Labour politicians and stooges. In other words, it's socialism all the way down now in England, with no moderating body at all. The Queen, of course, must do as she is told, and has no power to moderate anything or even openly complain about it, or she would be out of a job.
Kind of like a "instant replay review".
At any level of court action for silliness other than murder or such, each human being gets a single "bullsh!t" marker which trumps all.
When you pull it, you automatically get a 100 person jury of your peers who can vote to make you right in just this situation. Once you've used them all, you're out for a lifetime (no habitual appealers.)
But you should save them for bigtime abuses of bureaucracy like this.
Agreed.
He might want to leave well enough alone though. He might get charged for her bed and board too.
There are probably 12 new muzzies in britain every second. Or something like that.
WTF?!
Looks to me like they’re desperate to punish him no matter what.
“The woman was a serial accuser? What the hell was his lawyer doing the whole time to have that slip past him/her?”
From the article:
“She kept changing her name and moving around, so police forces never realised they were dealing with the same woman.”
Yep, I sure missed that one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.