Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomPoster
I thought that coal was around 65%, due to its abundance in the US, and the fear of American's for "nuclear power."

According to my last statement from PSE&G, I get 55% of my electricity via the nuclear power plant at Forked River. Lots of good fishing around said plant, btw.

In addition to the fact that the NIMBYs won't allow more nuclear plants to be built (they may have no choice, especially if we crack down on coal burners), a big issue we have is that so many of our nuclear plants use noncompatible components, making the maintenence of existing plants highly expensive, as basic parts often need to be customized at each plant. I know this has been a problem at Forked River for years.

41 posted on 12/31/2007 9:29:36 AM PST by Clemenza (Ronald Reagan was a "Free Traitor")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Clemenza

I’ve heard that before — that each nuke plant was a one-off design, and that the key to safety, lower costs, and easier approvals lies in standardizing. Makes sense.

I’m hoping to see a wave of demand get a dozen new plants begun all at once. Of course, if energy prices collapse that won’t happen.


133 posted on 12/31/2007 5:44:55 PM PST by Kellis91789 (Liberals aren't atheists. They worship government -- including human sacrifices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson