Posted on 12/30/2007 5:29:28 PM PST by melt
WASHINGTON (CNN) He may be a former president, but Democrat Hillary Clinton says husband Bill won't take part in sensitive national security briefings if she wins the White House.
In an interview with ABC News set to air Sunday, the New York Democrat says her husband will assume the traditional responsibilities of the president's spouse, and it "wouldn't be appropriate" for him to sit in on National Security Council meetings.
(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...
My Gawd, if Hillary gets elected we’ll see Carville doing her press conferences.
Bill won’t sit in on NSC meetings because President Fred will kick his ASS out and not let ‘em within 100 miles of D.C.
No way. When she’s in those meetings he’ll know where she is and so he’ll be over in the intern lounge.
Hell yeah Hillary would put him on the Supreme Court. That way she could get rid of him but the rest of us never could.
The way I see it, it’s the perfect arrangement. Bill would get real power for life, which is what he really wants, and because of the separation of powers, he would be forced to stay out of Hillary’s business so she could be president all on her own, something that Bill would never let happen otherwise.
This is a picture of supreme arrogance.
They do not care about Americans or America.
They only care about the power they seek to amass forever.
They are Charlatans.
They are Humbugs.
They are Sociaists.
They are a scourge.
Like Moctar Riady and John Huang.
Of course, not without being paid royally for it.
Dat’s Hillaryous!
If she wins, ex-hippie Hillary can schedule A"bed-in" anytime she wants.
I think you got the heading wrong - should it not read:
would be AMB A$$-ADORING?
Great pic——thanks!
Former POTUS get access to information anyway as I recall...
As far as I know, there is nothing barring him from being appointed to the Supreme Court. Besides, he is eligible to petition for reinstatement, but he hasn’t bothered. And he could easily get fixed up to practice law in New York instead, if current standing with a state bar is required. This is all so not a problem for the Clintons. They find a way around everything, even the Constitution.
That’s worthy of a “caption this pic” thread.
There are no constitutional requirements — however it would soon become a political issue....President nominates disbarred husband to the SCOTUS....
[AMB A$$-ADORING?]
Lol, actually I DID think of that FARS.
Size would be ‘large’ of course but I just couldn’t decide what font color to make A$$!
Of course not.
Barack won't stand for it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.