Posted on 12/26/2007 2:14:24 PM PST by Responsibility2nd
2008 Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid
Base price: $50,490
Price, as tested: $55,000 (est.)
Powertrain: Hybrid gas electric, 6.0-liter, 24-valve aluminum overhead-valve V8 with variable cylinder management and variable valve timing; continuously variable transmission; rear-wheel drive with locking rear differential
Horsepower: 332 at 5,100 rpm
Torque: 367 pound-feet at 4,100 rpm
Curb weight: 5,700 pounds (est.)
0-60 mph: 9 seconds
Wheelbase: 116 inches
Overall length: 202 inches
EPA fuel economy: 21 miles per gallon city, 22 mpg highway
Final thoughts: Chartreuse car of the year?
Hell, I do better than that with my 06 1500 Hemi Dodge. It has multi-fuel capability as well as multi displacement. I normally get 18 around town and 22-24 on the highway.
Yet the LS model starts at $34,000. Which is the better value?
Has anybody come out yet and calculated the cost to recharge the batteries?
Look at me, I'm conserving fuel! I care more than you do.
As a side note a buddy of mine got a Prius as a rental car. He managed to get it started to drive to my house, but spent 15 minutes trying to get it started to leave. After you put the key in you have to push the start button three times and push the accelerator to get it going.
Liberals can afford this and will buy it so much it will be back-ordered. Major sales.
Lease. It’s the Green Way.
Would horsepower and torque of the engine really matter that much in a hybrid? I would think that the performance of the electric motor would be more important, as peaking would come from the batteries, not the engine, with the engine providing power to the alternator along a fairly narrow range of performance.
Any hybrid engineers out there to set me straight on this?
I will not even lease that much money. No thanks. I get sick enough to my stomach when I paid $29,000 for a vehicle. I still think that is way too much, as mostly I am paying for the UAW's stinking benefits package.
Would horsepower and torque of the engine really matter that much in a hybrid?
For a family that has three kids, a couple of their friends, and has a boat to haul 5-6 times a year...well, this makes perfect sense. In fact, if I have the regular one and only put 5,000 miles a year on it, that is fine, too. Wait till we want to start recycling all these huge batteries.
Or the environmental, etc. cost of making the batteries ..... or of disposing of them when the time comes ....
Yeah, it’s just wrong a car should cost that much. They used to start about $1850 and go to $5000 for the most tricked out muscle car, and these cars these days still get flat tires and every other ill cars are prone to.
My ‘05 Tahoe gets 16 in town and 20 on the highway. The hybrid is not good enough for me to trade mine in.
I got 32 mpg highway with my 2001 corvette.
See, it's not really the "gas guzzling" that makes liberals all hinky about SUVs.
It's their size.
In their view, everybody should be driving econo-boxes. That way, "It would be fair"...
it is not a plug-in hybrid. the engine drives a generator that recharges the batteries. also the vehicle can recover otherwise lost energy from breaking and put it back in the battery.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.