Posted on 12/26/2007 1:15:28 PM PST by LowCountryJoe
Exactly right. That's why they have annual shareholder meetings. If they don't like the board who hired the bozo they can vote for a new board of directors and a new CEO. It's not the Gubmints job to limit or cap the salary of the CEO of a company or any other American.
In Gupta's case, the shareholder meetings are a charade. He rigs the stock allocations to control a 51% majority. He handpicks the directors, and they are effectively his sock puppets. The annual meeting is held in a frozen cornfield far away from the business location, and lasts five minutes with no opportunity to ask questions. Gupta then does things like personally buy stock in acquisition targets right before he announces a takeover of the target, which personally enriches him at the expense of the shareholders of his company. It's a blatant conflict-of-interest. (And meanwhile, he's giving away millions to the Clintons and selling rigged polls to CNN.) This sort of manipulation of inside information should be illegal, and it is the sort of abuse that Huckabee is saying corporations should put a stop to. I'm certain that Huckabee would veto any attempt to impose salary caps, but it's likely that he would advocate greater accountability to shareholders.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.