Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: petertare
Im flumoxed—Thompson makes me gag on my first amend words. He does not like them.

You're wrong there. What Fred didn't like, and the main reason he supported CFR, was the anonymous big donors giving money to push their candidate and bash the opposition, with NO accountability. He would love to have individuals figure prominently in the fundraising, and feel 'ownership' of their government again.

50 posted on 12/25/2007 6:22:25 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: SuziQ; petertare; All
All right, I am going to make this simple because I am tired of seeing it.

FDT did not support CFR to silence anyone on an individual level. The Democrats have always out raised us because our rich work for a living and do not have disposable income, they are invested in their business. A millionaire Hollywood type will drop a million in a second to help a Democrat because their money is right there, ready to spend, not tied up in capital.

He wanted to level things in our favor.

Indeed the giant Soros and such funded organization on the Democrats side bear out Fred's concern. They do have more money to throw around because their rich from sports and Hollywood don't care what they spend money on. They will drop a million for crack right after sending a million to the Democrats or their flunkies. they don't have families and employees to worry about, or at least any they care about.

It just did not work out as planned, now he is for a free for all. .

Damn, why is that so hard to get.

81 posted on 12/25/2007 12:40:01 PM PST by ejonesie22 (In America all people have a right to be wrong, some just exercise it a bit much...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson