.
These crooks have a support group?
Hey Edith, at least one of your "friends" thinks that you and Richard are a couple of low life p****s.
McLean and Stevens , still at it.
Corrupt Texas judges bump.
The letter covers five points about the case:It must be really nice to be a mind-reader but shouldn't one be able to keep the story consistent from one paragraph to the next?The Kirlins never intended to build a dream home there, as they've told reporters, McLean and Stevens wrote.
The land in question is only 11 percent of the Kirlins' combined lots, but is typically referred to as one-third of their property. "The Kirlins still have the full right and ability to build their 'dream home' on the remaining property as they had always intended," the letter continues.
Had they made a “public case” out of it a mob with pitchforks and torches would have descended on them. They used their political connections and legal knowledge to steal from their neighbors. One way or another, these shysters will be punished for their crime.
Thanks for your updates on this issue, George.
Getting land by adverse possession has been around forever. It seems odd, but there are valid reasons why land can be given to another party, for example, if the land is off the tax rolls. There are usually pretty strict requirements that have to be met. Were they met in this case?
The phrase, “unmitigated gall” comes to mind...
Exactly right George and thanks for the ping.
They need to admit to being pond scum, pay the Kirlin’s their lawyer fees, and go crawl in a hole. That would work for me. Who in the heck are their supporters anyway? She must have spent a whole 82 cents on postage.
effem
From “The Law Defends Plunder”....
...Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Thus the beneficiaries are spared the shame, danger, and scruple which their acts would otherwise involve. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons, and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim — when he defends himself — as a criminal. In short, there is a legal plunder, and it is of this, no doubt, that Mr. de Montalembert speaks.
This legal plunder may be only an isolated stain among the legislative measures of the people. If so, it is best to wipe it out with a minimum of speeches and denunciations — and in spite of the uproar of the vested interests.
More here...
http://bastiat.org/en/the_law.html#SECTION_G1415
Thanks for the ping, george. Thanks to FReeper raygun for the link.
Outstanding FReeper comments! BTTT!
Kinda like my first x-wife; “Well, I got everything I wanted so I guess we can be friends now”..;’}
Easy enough: pay for the property (at whatever your neighbors' value it), AND pay for all expenses your neighbors incurred defending it.
And no, I won't hold my breath waiting for it to happen...
IIRC, the land thieves went back to court later and told the judge to give them more land, because the judge incorrectly calculated how much to award them in the first ruling. The judge refused to assist in any additional land grab.
I was just wondering-wondering mind you......what would happen if say some type of toxic material was found on the “newly acquired” piece of land? It could be maybe a big honking heap of CFLB(compact florescent light bulbs)or cadmium(from rechargeable batteries)the mind does boggle.
Of course the previous owners had no knowledge of any thing wrong with the land when THEY BOUGHT IT! Sooo, who would have to pay to clean it up? In accordance with Bolder-dashes tough but fair commie environmental standards?
I’m just thinking out loud.