Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

York housing agency bans religious decorations (SCROOGE ALERT UPDATE)
The York Dispatch ^ | 12/21/07 | Daina Klimanis

Posted on 12/23/2007 4:58:07 AM PST by Nextrush

In Christmases past, residents of Kingston House in West York hung a tree with Santa Clauses and decorated a common room with puzzles showing Christ in a manger.

School groups and carolers came through the halls singing "Hark! The Herald Angels Sing," "O Little Town of Bethlehem" and other popular Christian hymns.

But things are different this December. At Kingston House and other properties owned by the York Area Development Corporation, songs or decorations in common areas must be secular.

The same policy applies to hundreds of tenants in York City's Delphia House and other apartments managed by the development corporation. No stars or angels, menorahs or references to Christ are allowed, unless residents want to decorate their own doors or apartments.

The development corporation is one of numerous organizations restricting religious displays for fear of excluding residents or violating fair housing laws administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, which provides much of its funding......

Penny Myers, executive director of the development corporation, declined to comment on the new rules.....

The Fair Housing Institute Inc., a consulting company based in Norcross, Ga., tells housing providers to avoid potential fines and lawsuits by keeping common areas "religiously neutral."......

....HUD issued a statement saying it did not endorse such prohibitions.

"The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development continues to strongly support and respect display of all religious symbols on properties receiving HUD assistance," said the statement. "We discourage anyone from interfering in the free exercise of religion and prohibiting residents from celebrating the joys of the season."....

Now that religious displays have been restricted, (Barry) Shuler said he's considering his own court challenge.

"They're infringing on my constitutional rights of freedom of speech and freedom of expression, and I feel they need to be brought to task." Shuler said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: antichristmas; christmas; christmascarols; culturewars; diversity; happyholidays; hud; multiculturalism; seasonsgreetings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Maceman

Because his name is similar to ‘Grinch’.


21 posted on 12/23/2007 7:51:51 AM PST by wastedyears ("I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery." - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

“Religiously Neutral” means “Censorship of Religion”


22 posted on 12/23/2007 8:54:22 PM PST by TheEaglehasLanded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

congress doesn't have to. a thousand private and pseudo-private institutions will.

23 posted on 12/25/2007 12:05:05 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (whose spirit is hillary channelling these days?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
private and pseudo-private institutions

I should just acquiesce and use the term "NGO" in its true meaning.

24 posted on 12/25/2007 12:06:01 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (whose spirit is hillary channelling these days?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
Well, that is the 1st Amendment. And Congress is the only institution that can pass a law to establish a religion, but they are restricted from doing so. Private and pseudo-private institutions can not pass a law that says you and I have to go to the Glory Bound Baptist Church every Sunday.
25 posted on 12/25/2007 6:23:02 AM PST by do the dhue (They've got us surrounded again. The poor bastards. General Creighton Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue
and pseudo-private institutions

can and do make rules that congress is forbidden to.

Pardon that I didn't distinguish between such rules and "laws." It will be noted that, often, the former are more effective than the latter.

Merry Christmas.

26 posted on 12/25/2007 9:35:01 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (whose spirit is hillary channelling these days?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson