Posted on 12/22/2007 10:38:31 PM PST by Stoat
THIS is what the father chooses to say after the trial? I'm sure the females were thinking..."Hey, yo! He wazza good kid, ya know?" "He didn't deserve ta be killed because he didn't do nuthin!" "Deese kids was angles..totally innicent I tell ya..."
Mr.White: Next time, 1.) have wife call the police while you... 2.) Turn on the porch light so these little darlings can see you when you... 3.)Open the main door to your house, leaving the screen door closed. 4.) If they try and open the door, or try and break in through the back, all bets are off. The wife on the phone screaming that they tried to open the door or throw things at the window, or break in the back while you excercise your right to self- defense will be gold in the courtroom.
Uh, I think everyone is missing the most important piece of information in the whole article.
Mr white claims he shot the kid by accident. That is an ADMISSION OF GUILT! If he had said he was attacked and shot him in self defense, then we’d have something to argue about. But that’s not what happened. It was an accidental shooting. Someone died due to an accidental shooting. That is MANSLAUGHTER! He must do jail time for that.
There’s no ifs ands or buts about it.
-end of story
different ending today
White didn’t play by the rules!
I feel sorry for the guy.
I still want to know about those threats.
I want screenshots of those mspace threats dangit!
I need facts! Hell, for all anyone knows the idiot kid could have posted them himself and conned his buddy into saying that he actually did it.
Needs more dataz plz.
The MSM isn’t touching this aspect for some reason (well yes the MSM sucks at all things internet but that is beside the point).
If someone killed your son or daughter, I think you would have the right to say just about anything you want.
One of the important facts not mentioned here but included in a previously-linked article is that no one in the White family called the police before or after the shooting. When the kid was dead Mr. White called his lawyer.
None of that matters. He clearly said he shot the kid by accident.
Why can’t you figure out what that means? If he had felt he was being threatened, he would have fired INTENTIONALLY!
Get it?
I like looking at precipitating factors. You missed the point of my posts completely. I was referring to rape threats that were allegedly made by the son of the shooter (or his friend) against a young female. This occurred many months prior.
I’m on Mr White’s side on this one...you don’t threaten someone on their own property.
One of the ‘facts’ on some of the other threads was that the threatening phone call, warning that the ‘mob’ was on the way was made TWENTY MINUTES before they got there. The police certainly would have gotten there in 20 minutes.
Like I just posted...
IT DOESNT’ MATTER!
How can you claim “self defense” if you did it by accident?
Use your dam brain for a second.
This guy(mr white) is either extremely stupid(for claiming it was an accident) or extremely honest(I doubt it) or he figured he couldn’t win and chose to look guilty to a lesser charge by saying it was an accident. But whatever the case is, he sealed his fate the instant he claimed it was an accident.
And shoot an unarmed kid IN THE FACE ?
OMG. k.
(¬_¬)/¯ I am still going to find what that whole mspace thing was about though.
Thank you for posting that... Now I see the rationale for the charge and the verdict. Nothing like a splash of cold water to wake up the old noggin.
Goodnight, valleygirl. I’m wasting my time reasoning with one that doesn’t reason. I’m going to bed.
I don’t have a link for this but one thing I did read in a few of the articles I looked over is that he had called 911 numerous times in the past for minor incidents.
That may have hurt him in court for not making the call that night.
Night!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.