Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: samtheman; Egon; Wilhelm Tell; wolfpat; TonyRo76; Always Right; jan in Colorado
Four bright FReepers wrote: The GOP used to have a strong philosophy of smaller, limited government. I see the abandonment of this principle as the biggest problem with the GOP today. "Compassionate Conservatism" has turned out to be "Nanny-State Socialism."

Of course, Always Right is correct in pointing out...

Gridlock is better than the crap that went on when the GOP was in the majority.

Somehow, though, I don't want to hope for a GOP minority...I'd rather a re-energized conservative GOP, one that fights against neoconsocialism and returns us to a government that does what it needs to do or should do, not what it can or could do.

wolfpat pointed out:
I think we all are [annoyed at GOP majority lack of progress], and that's why in 2006 enough people voted with their butts to let the RATS in.

Do we think that the GOP got the right message from it all? At what point do we stop believing the "I'm conservative" mantra that is often unfulfilled once the candidate gets into office?

21 posted on 12/22/2007 11:17:59 AM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Gondring

Good post, Gondring. If only we could get as organized and energized behind a good conservative candidate (there are only 2, Hunter and Thompson) as we did to stop the MexicoAnnexationOfAmerica bill pushed by McCain, Kennedy and Bush.

If only.


25 posted on 12/22/2007 11:57:45 AM PST by samtheman (Huckabee. A Bible-Packing Leftist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson