Posted on 12/19/2007 7:44:57 PM PST by Tlaloc
MANCHESTER, N.H., Dec. 19 /Christian Newswire/ -- Eleven protesters led by national anti-abortion activist Randall Terry were arrested yesterday outside Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign office.
The pro-life activists, from Florida, Ohio, New Jersey, Maryland, and New Hampshire, were released later that day with trespassing charges while Mr. Terry remained in custody awaiting his court hearing.
Terry's message to the GOP and ethical voters:
"Rudy Giuliani can not ignore pro-life voters or the Republican party's pro-life platform.""Rudy's position on pre-born babies makes him unfit to hold office and certainly means he will not carry conservative voters into election day."
"We must expose Rudy for who he is -- a deceitful left-wing Democrat masquerading as a Republican."
"New Hampshire is America's primary. What happens in New Hampshire will affect every voter in America."
Randall Terry's supporters will be picketing starting at 8 a.m., for the third day in a row in New Hampshire, outside of the County Courthouse, at 35 Amherst, Manchester, NH, waiting for his release.
dittos
You’re not the only one. When I saw the headline I was certain it was members of his staff.
Oh well, maybe we’ll have better luck next time.
I would not give most people the benefit of the doubt, but (because I knew Randy: I'll explain this later)I would give Randy the benefit in two ways: I wouldn't necessarily assume that a direct quote in a newspaper was accurate; and I would assume that there was some context that made better sense of it.
That's giving him quite a bit of benefit of the doubt, you might say. Granted. But I think it's justified because I worked for Randy for a number of months with Operation Rescue, and saw his character. Though when I left O.R. I had some serious questions about his leadership, those questions did not involve any violence or malice on his part.
Maybe a personal story would cast some light on why I'm giving Randy a bit of latitude. I once sat in on a conversation between him and some students at a Christian college (he was a guest speaker in the class.) He'd said that God hates abortion and perversion. Some of the students objected to the idea that God "hates" and argued instead that Jesus says we should be "tolerant"; Randy came back with the good point that the moral weight of "hate" and "tolerate" depends entirely on the object of the verbs: what is it you're hating, and what is it you're tolerating?
Using a concordance, he of course easily proved his point: Scripture shows that God hates "falsehood" and "worthless idols" "haughty eyes," "a lying tongue," "hands that shed innocent blood.
So I would strongly suspect that he was making a larger point in that "hate" and "intolerance" speech quoted by the Ft. Wayne News Sentinel or whatever.
It's still rhetorical excess, I think, to put that sort of thing in a public speech rather than in a discussion with Bible students. He's certainly foolish to supply reporters with hot pull-out quotes.
But I am obliged by old association to give him a certain amount of latitude, and I suppose that you are under no such obligation. Fair enough. But do keep in mind that only the man running the race can stumble; we on the sidelines never do, and (speaking for myself) I fear that we can be judged for that as well.
I agree.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.