Please scroll back upthread and see where this all started... it was where wagglebee questioned this phrase: "if one is to believe he is responsible for the 911 attacks"
I used to think that anti-Paul kooks were purely bitter leftists, but now I realize that many are simply in some part ignorant.
If anyone reading is in the latter category and unable to handle hypotheticals, Socratic examination, and elenchai/aporia, then I'm sure taxed2death can explain the original point in simpler terms or more explicitly.
But don't forget that most third-party readers of the thread are bright enough to understand the word "if" in rhetoric and they don't just gloss over it as if it weren't there.
I'm hoping that wagglebee, et al., just missed the word "if" and are not really the ignorant-kook type.
And before anyone thinks that I just called y'all kooks, he should re-read the words I used and refer to a good English textbook.
Nope. I haven’t missed anything; even your arrogant and patronizing contempt.
To bad you have nothing worthwhile with which to back it up except a blind belief in RuPaul. But that’s typical.
Well, since taxed2death has been banned, we don’t really know what he meant. He said he believes that OBL was “largely” responsible for 9/11 and seemed to follow it up by saying that the other responsible parties were other Islamofascists, and I’m okay with that explanation.