Posted on 12/18/2007 2:50:02 PM PST by cdnerds
Edited on 12/18/2007 5:24:27 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
NATIONAL ENQUIRER WORLD EXCLUSIVE: JOHN EDWARDS LOVE CHILD SCANDAL!
The woman linked to Presidential candidate John Edwards in a cheating scandal is more than six months pregnant and telling a close confidante that Edwards is the father of her unborn child, The NATIONAL ENQUIRER has learned exclusively.
The NATIONAL ENQUIRER's political bombshell comes just weeks after Edwards emphatically denied having an affair with Rielle Hunter, who formerly worked on his campaign.
But The ENQUIRER has now confirmed not only that Rielle is pregnant, but she is also living in Chapel Hill, N.C. in a gated community, just a few streets away from Andrew Young, who has been a key official in Edwards' campaign.
Young has been in charge of looking after Hunter, according to sources, and she has been careful to stay out of sight during Edwards' campaign. A former Director of Operations for Edwards' campaign, Young's last official position with the campaign was North Carolina Finance Director.
He left that job about a month ago — nearly the same time Rielle relocated from the New Jersey area to Chapel Hill.
In a bizarre twist, Young, a 41-year-old married man with young children, now claims HE is the father of Reille's baby.
But others are skeptical about his claim and talk of a political cover up is heating up.
Reille, when contacted in person by the NATIONAL ENQUIRER, denied that she was Reille Hunter. Later, she hired a lawyer and issued a statement, saying that Young is the father.
But a source close to the 43-year-old divorcee says Rielle has told a far different story privately.
"Rielle told me she had a secret affair with Edwards. When she found out that she was pregnant she said he was the father."
Rielle loves Edwards and will do anything to protect him, the source said.
The NATIONAL ENQUIRER has obtained exclusive photos of a visibly pregnant Rielle and learned from close sources that she has been in phone contact with Edwards. That information has not been denied by anyone.
"Rielle told me while Andrew Young is a friend, she's not romantically involved with him," says the source close to Rielle.
MORE DETAILS WILL BE POSTED HERE LATER AND ARE IN THE NEXT EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER!
Will this push Richardson, Dodd or Biden into 3rd?
Democrat voters are so gullible they will believe whatever they are told to believe. If the MSM reacts with outrage and horror, they'll care. If the MSM blows it off, that it's no big deal, they won't care.
more like “Baby C Note” .
probably born in the back of an ambulance,too.
is this her?
http://wonkette.com/politics/possible-sex-scandal-dept%27/did-john-edwards-sleep-with-this-lady-309751.php
Did John Edwards Sleep With This Lady?
“That said, this story has Hillary’s muddy hoofprints all over it. I really hope that hideous bitch pays some day.”
If the story is true however, Edwards won’t have anyone to blame but himself.
Is that Hillary out ‘stumping’ ??
Which at the time , Clinton’s attorney was David Kendall, who was an attorney for the N’tl Enquirer.
Wouldn’t it be a hoot if John gets booted out of the race by his wife, and she runs for President instead?
I think we can also agree on where this salacious story probably emanated from.
You have a point.
Mr. Clinton had an advantage over any other candidate of either major party - he didn’t have to face Bill and Hillary Clinton as political opponents.
As well, it is Mr. Clinton’s example in part, I’d think, that would inform potential candidates that this is a very, very hard way to go.
sitetest
One would think that after Mr. Hart’s debacle, and the abuse (well-deserved) taken by Mr. Clinton for his indiscretions, that potential candidates would be put off by the prospect of having this sort of thing used to drag them through the mud.
sitetest
Clinton’s fingerprints are all over this!
What a menu for the dems: A drug dealer, a spooge-spreader, and an enabler of another spooge-spreader.
Harry Truman must be lovin’ him some of this.
“Because we all know the National Enquirer checks, re-checks, and then checks again.”
The National Enquirer is more credible than the New Republic or the New York Times.
Uh Oh! That ought to blow him out of the water!
I agree.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.