Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/18/2007 5:54:41 AM PST by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BGHater

Big bttt!!!!!


2 posted on 12/18/2007 6:02:03 AM PST by Guenevere (Duncan Hunter...President '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
it sends a message to every law-enforcement agent that if you shoot in the line of duty and cannot prove you were justified in using deadly force you will be prosecuted and receive about 10 years incarceration.

Small correction. It should read:

"it sends a message to every law-enforcement agent that if you counter the Bush agenda on unfettered illegal immigration, then you will be charged with something, no matter how ridiculous, and sent to prison for a long time.

3 posted on 12/18/2007 6:02:09 AM PST by Barney Gumble (A liberal is someone too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
So nice to know that our Fourth Amendment covers drug running illegal aliens.

From the Fourth concerning border searches --''That searches made at the border, pursuant to the longstanding right of the sovereign to protect itself by stopping and examining persons and property crossing into this country, are reasonable simply by virtue of the fact that they occur at the border, should, by now, require no extended demonstration.'' Authorized by the First Congress, the customs search in these circumstances requires no warrant, no probable cause, not even the showing of some degree of suspicion that accompanies even investigatory stops. Moreover, while prolonged detention of travelers beyond the routine customs search and inspection must be justified by the Terry standard of reasonable suspicion having a particularized and objective basis, Terry protections as to the length and intrusiveness of the search do not apply.

4 posted on 12/18/2007 6:03:25 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

We’ve gotta disassociate ourselves from Jorge—or we’re toast.
This act (or inaction) is way beyond disgusting.


6 posted on 12/18/2007 6:07:48 AM PST by Flintlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

Personally, I don’t think President’s should be pardoning anybody, under most circumstances.

And sorry, these two should not be ‘pardoned’.

A commutation of sentence, perhaps, but not a pardon. They’ve shown they should NEVER be allowed to carry a firearm and a badge again. The poor judgement they exercised cannot be denied.

But you can make the case the sentence was way to harsh given the circumstances.


7 posted on 12/18/2007 6:11:25 AM PST by Badeye (No thanks, Huck, I'm not whitewashing the fence for you this election cycle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

These two were featured on Americas Most Wanted in a segment that completely ripped the Federal Prosecutor. As big a fan as I am of John Walsh, I still couldn’t believe it was so absolutely one-sided in favor of the BP agents.


11 posted on 12/18/2007 6:32:52 AM PST by samson1097
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

Remember GWB is said to be “loyal” to his “friends”. So Johnny Sutton can block such pardons. In fact, the pardons were never even considered by the stubborn GWB.


20 posted on 12/18/2007 10:37:38 AM PST by Theodore R. ( Cowardice is still forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson