Skip to comments.
Norway's emissions up 80%
Aftenposten (Norway) ^
| 12/17/07
| Nina Berglund
Posted on 12/17/2007 12:39:47 PM PST by gridlock
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Via the indispensible Hot Air
1
posted on
12/17/2007 12:39:50 PM PST
by
gridlock
To: gridlock
The signatories to Kyoto act as if signing the paper is all that is required of them. They have gone about their merry way, with only the thinnest veneer of window-dressing efforts.
Meanwhile, the excoriate the United States...
2
posted on
12/17/2007 12:41:05 PM PST
by
gridlock
(Cats always land on their feet, but babies always land on their heads...)
To: gridlock
U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Declined 1.5 Percent in 2006
Total U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were 7,075.6 million metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent (MMTCO2e) in 2006, a decrease of 1.5 percent from the 2005 level according to Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2006, a report released today by the Energy Information Administration (EIA). Since 1990, U.S. GHG emissions have grown at an average annual rate of 0.9 percent. The 2006 emissions decrease is only the third decline in annual emissions since 1990.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/press/press291.html
3
posted on
12/17/2007 12:43:07 PM PST
by
Brad from Tennessee
("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
To: Brad from Tennessee
Is there any other industrialized nation that has had recent declines in CO2 emissions, other than the members of the former Eastern Bloc, who have failed their way to success?
4
posted on
12/17/2007 12:47:01 PM PST
by
gridlock
(Cats always land on their feet, but babies always land on their heads...)
To: gridlock
Looks as if the silly Norveegians will have to shut down their refinery and quit driving cars, eh ?
5
posted on
12/17/2007 12:47:41 PM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Nobody is going to bother to break the Norweigians’ chops over greenhouse gases. They will just be assumed to be green. Meanwhile, the US could slash emissions, and still be beat up on by the entire World.
Which should give you a clue that it is not about greenhouse gases, after all.
6
posted on
12/17/2007 12:51:53 PM PST
by
gridlock
(Cats always land on their feet, but babies always land on their heads...)
To: gridlock
Please turn off the Statoil refinery until further notice. Citizens shall use horse and mule power and travel by sled, skis and bicycles. Oh, walking is acceptable as long as you make your own boots.
7
posted on
12/17/2007 12:56:59 PM PST
by
citizen
("Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." Benjamin Franklin)
To: gridlock
The irony of all of this and Kyoto is that the United States has had a smaller increase in carbon emissions than those who agreed to Kyoto, and our economy has grown more than theirs!
8
posted on
12/17/2007 12:56:59 PM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Looks as if the silly Norveegians will have to shut down their refinery and quit driving cars, eh ?And once they are told to set their thermostats down, they will be thanking their lucky stars for global warming.
9
posted on
12/17/2007 12:58:28 PM PST
by
goldfinch
To: citizen
Oh, walking is acceptable as long as you make your own boots. And as long as you don't exhale. :=)
10
posted on
12/17/2007 1:00:06 PM PST
by
Bob
To: gridlock
Norway's emissions up ... imagine them running a story like, "well, we had to generate extra electricity and burn more natural gas because it was unseasonably cold this year. [heard off stage: "hey, you can't say that!"] Oh, wait, did I say cold? er, I meant to say ... well, what did I mean to say? Oh, screw it!"
11
posted on
12/17/2007 1:06:31 PM PST
by
NonValueAdded
(Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
To: gridlock
I believe that France did pretty well, but Germany and Italy are going to pay large fines.
12
posted on
12/17/2007 1:09:38 PM PST
by
expatpat
To: gridlock
I don’t think so.
Industrial efficiency, including energy conservation, is tied to profit. Efficiency is a constant process in the U.S. despite Kyoto.
The U.S. also has vast carbon sinks in its forests, grazing lands and farm acreage for which it gets no credit. Meanwhile much of the Third World are destroying their forests through logging and slash-and-burn agriculture with no system of reforestation.
13
posted on
12/17/2007 1:11:32 PM PST
by
Brad from Tennessee
("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
To: Phantom Lord
The irony of all of this and Kyoto is that the United States has had a smaller increase in carbon emissions than those who agreed to Kyoto... Yes, but they feel so much better about themselves...
14
posted on
12/17/2007 1:15:47 PM PST
by
gridlock
(Cats always land on their feet, but babies always land on their heads...)
To: gridlock
Erik Solheim, the government minister in charge of environmental issues who was in Bali last week, admits that Norway's own high level of emissions is "embarrassing." That's why the government plans to donate NOK 15 billion (nearly USD 3 billion) over the next five years to help preserve the world's rain forests. That's viewed as an efficient way of offsetting carbon emissions.After the UN gets their pass-thru cut approximately $100,000 should be left to benefit the rain forrests.
15
posted on
12/17/2007 1:16:42 PM PST
by
OrioleFan
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
To: OrioleFan
That's why the government plans to donate NOK 15 billion (nearly USD 3 billion) over the next five years to help preserve the world's rain forests. I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today -- Wimpy
16
posted on
12/17/2007 1:18:19 PM PST
by
gridlock
(Cats always land on their feet, but babies always land on their heads...)
To: OrioleFan
Oil for Food II
Why don’t they just sink the $3 Billion into making their own processes more efficient?
17
posted on
12/17/2007 1:19:34 PM PST
by
gridlock
(Cats always land on their feet, but babies always land on their heads...)
To: gridlock
Norway's main exports: Oil, Gas, Sanctimony.
To: Dagnabitt
And sanctimony is by far the most profitable of the three...
19
posted on
12/17/2007 1:25:54 PM PST
by
gridlock
("I'd gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today" -- J. Wellington Wimpy)
To: gridlock
Is there any other industrialized nation that has had recent declines in CO2 emissions, other than the members of the former Eastern Bloc, who have failed their way to success? I'm sure theirs have skyrocketed since about 2000 or so but will probably never be as dirty as it was under communism.
20
posted on
12/17/2007 1:41:53 PM PST
by
VeniVidiVici
(No buy China!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson