Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: saganite

“We won’t prosecute you, if you promise not to sue us...”

Or, something like that......


7 posted on 12/17/2007 8:42:16 AM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: ButThreeLeftsDo

“We won’t prosecute you, if you promise not to sue us...”

Or, something like that......

And I’d be saying, “F*** You. I’m suing, go ahead and arrest me for defending my family against an unknown intrusion. ANYONE can SHOUT ‘POLICE!’ can’t they moron!”

Then I’d sue them for false arrest, endangerment, shooting my dog and kicking my door in. Good grief, this is BS. SWAT teams should be held in reserve for KNOWN SITUATIONS that can’t be handled by regular law enforcement personnel. Once they have the goods on someone and an arrest goes wrong, that’s when SWAT is supposed to come in. That was their ORIGINAL purpose, and they need to keep them back until then.

SWAT belongs at hostage situations and KNOWN bad guys being holed up after an LE contact, not kicking in doors in the middle of the night.


36 posted on 12/17/2007 9:06:15 AM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson