Posted on 12/16/2007 10:35:18 PM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative
When Al Gore received the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to raise awareness about man-made climate change, his acceptance speech featured a new word, or rather a new sense of an old word, that Oxford lexicographers have been watching closely: carbon, in the sense of carbon dioxide or other gaseous carbon compounds released into the atmosphere. As I wrote back in July, this extended sense of carbon can be found in all sorts of novel lexical compounds: carbon-neutral (2006 New Oxford American Dictionary Word of the Year), carbon footprint, carbon tax, carbon trading, and so forth. In his speech, Gore introduced another compound into the mix: carbon summer.
More than two decades ago, scientists calculated that nuclear war could throw so much debris and smoke into the air that it would block life-giving sunlight from our atmosphere, causing a nuclear winter, Gore said. Now science is warning us that if we do not quickly reduce the global warming pollution that is trapping so much of the heat our planet normally radiates back out of the atmosphere, we are in danger of creating a permanent carbon summer.
Nuclear winter, the model for carbon summer, was introduced into public discourse in 1983, when a team of scientists including Richard Turco and Carl Sagan published a landmark article in the journal Science. The earliest citation in the Oxford English Dictionary is actually a newspaper column by Sagan from a couple of months earlier, previewing the teams findings. Sagan described scenarios of nuclear war involving detonations from 100 to 5000 megatons. Even the 100-megaton scenario, Sagan wrote, would ignite thousands of fires, and the smoke from these fires alone would be enough to generate an epoch of cold and dark almost as severe as in the 5000 megaton case. This epoch of cold and dark was dubbed nuclear winter by Turcos team. Though the research findings were the subject of much dispute about the mixing of science and politics, nuclear winter remained a potent image throughout the US-Soviet standoff of the 1980s.
The public acceptance of the nuclear winter concept more than twenty years ago now helps to shape the discussion of climate change, with the equivalent scenario of carbon summer suggested by scientists investigating possible tipping points for a massive, irreversible global meltdown. Gore was not, in fact, the first to come up with the expression carbon summer. It turned up in a June 29, 1988 hearing held by the U.S. House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology on Technologies for Remediating Global Warming. During the hearing, Dr. Erik Storm of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory made the exact same parallel to nuclear winter: I think that the discussion and possibility of a nuclear winter truly raised the concern of the effects of nuclear war to a global concern. I personally believe that that was a significant factor in the discussion that has led to the first real nuclear arms reduction. Dr. Storm continued, Id like to hope that the prospect and discussion of what one might call carbon summer will also stimulate action, action on a very broad international level.
There was evidently not much media attention paid to the testimony of Dr. Storm (quite an appropriate name for a climate change expert, by the way). Gores high-profile speech in Oslo, on the other hand, has a vastly greater chance of popularizing carbon summer as an environmental buzzword. By now were much more used to hearing carbon used in various combining forms related to the emission of greenhouse gases. In his Nobel speech, Gore used carbon in two other such contexts. First, he suggested that the innovators who will invent an engine thats carbon-negative may live in Lagos or Mumbai or Montevideo. Carbon-negative goes carbon-neutral one better, implying that a fuel source can sequester more carbon dioxide than it releases into the atmosphere (for instance, with biofuels that transfer carbon dioxide back into the soil). Later in the speech, Gore stressed that we need to put a price on carbon with a CO2 tax that is then rebated back to the people, progressively. Here carbon is understood as shorthand for the pollution of the atmosphere with carbon dioxide, which could be curtailed by the implementation of a tax on major polluters.
Regardless of whether one agrees with Gores stance on climate change and how to ameliorate it, its clear that carbon really has taken on a new meaning, as Shorter Oxford English Dictionary editor Angus Stevenson recently told The Guardian. Gore might be a trendsetter in this semantic expansion, but it will take the rest of us carbon-based life forms to set the path for the future of carbon.
Ping
What about “carbon-based”? It’s what we are, after all. Maybe we’re a bad thing for the planet, too.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
If nuclear winter comes from burning carbon, wouldn’t it be immediately followed by carbon summer?
NEWSWEEK: AL GORE NOW WORTH MORE THAN $100 MILLION
[Since 2000, according to published reports, the former veep has transformed himself from a public servant with around $1 million in the bank to a sparkling private consultant with a net worth estimated to be north of $100 million. Hes a senior adviser to Google, a board member at Apple and now a newly minted general partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, the Silicon Valley venture-capital firm that made billions investing early in Netscape, Amazon and Google.]
Holy f&%* these people are stupid.
Yippe, we have the solution to “carbon summer” — we just have to be ready to create the appropriate counter-balancing “nuclear winter” by obliterating Iran’s govt. and IRGC forces, nuke facilities, etc. whenever the time is right....
I prefer Irish Spring myself.
~~Anthropogenic Global Warming ping~~
Had record cold and snow in December here in MA. Can’t remember the last mention of global warming.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.