I did listen to Wiener’s/Savage’s show. It is an act. Savage has been a life-long leftist and has all his life looking to be famous and make a quick buck. So is it illogical to assume that Weiner created Savage to make a buck and become famous.He saw what a sucess Rush was and this was his model.
This liberal is laughing at all of us conservatives but even laughing more at his audience who believe his act. I’ve even heard him put down Americans and his audience. He is laughing at his supporters who are making him rich and he thinks they are idiots for falling for his act.
Savage lets some of his liberal positions slip sometimes and thats how i know he is a liberal ( that and knowing his past).
You might be able to spin some of the liberal things Savage has done like donating to a liberal pro-illegal democrat like Jerry brown but you can’t spin all the things he’s done put together. I’ve heard him even call for the Republican speaker of the House Denny Hastert’s resignation during the height of the congressional elections . and Savage’s “reason” for calling for this resignation was the liberal media manufactured Foley fiasco.
I can’t count how many times I’ve heard Savage say there is no difference between Democrats and Republicans, bash Republicans, bash Bush, bash Corporations, call for raising the minimum wage, expouse radical leftist environmental positions, call for more gun legislation (during the Cho case) and take other liberal positions.
Savage defeated the Amnesty bill by urging his listeners to call congress. Unlike Bill O’reilly, who endorsed it on his tv show.
So somebody who was a liberal in the 60s can’t become conservative? Yea, that makes sense. I was a liberal before 9/11.
You should support Savage because he has freedom of speech. Or, do you only support freedom of speech for republican Bush-loving talk show hosts? By default, you ARE supporting CAIR. Maybe you should stop bashing Michael Savage and worry about CAIR trying to silence people who criticize Islam.