1 posted on
12/15/2007 10:08:15 AM PST by
linuxster
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: linuxster
Funny, thats not the kind of judges he appointed when he was governor.
Is this another one of those conversions he has recently had?
2 posted on
12/15/2007 10:12:31 AM PST by
Dreagon
To: linuxster
I will vote for him, unless Fred comes on strong then he has my vote. I will not vote for Huckabee unless he wins and is in the general election, then I will hold my nose and pull the lever because its either that or Hillary, Barack or Edwards and I find that unacceptable.
3 posted on
12/15/2007 10:14:52 AM PST by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: linuxster
Depends on how you define “mainstream.”
4 posted on
12/15/2007 10:15:06 AM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: linuxster
Insincere or inconsistent as he's been, Romney is saying the right things, and he
was a popular governor and an effective executive in private business.
Guliani has always been a state employee and hes not even trying to assuage the bulk of the Republican electorate. Huckabee is a Jimmy Carter clone, Thompson appears dandering and ineffective ( so far) and McCain is a fraud, so wheres that leave everybody?
For Goodness Sakes, lets focus...No more Hillary!
To: linuxster
Romney would have to choose someone like Hunter for VP for me to vote for him. I’d be the first to admit that would be a potent GOP ticket, as Hunter balances out Romney’s lack of social conservatism & military expertise.
To: linuxster
11 posted on
12/15/2007 10:18:09 AM PST by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: linuxster
13 posted on
12/15/2007 10:26:43 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
To: linuxster
15 posted on
12/15/2007 10:27:18 AM PST by
kjam22
(see me play the guitar here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noHy7Cuoucc)
To: All
No, for the simple reason that I keep expecting him to walk into a store and ask “can I get me a hunting license here?”
16 posted on
12/15/2007 10:30:37 AM PST by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: linuxster
Looks more and more like Romney. Fred just didn’t take off. Rudy has serious problems about his personal life and his lack of guts on illegal immigrants while mayor. McCain is a hero and POW, but his politics are all over the place. He isn’t trusted. Huckabee is the Republican Carter.
So, I guess it’s Mitt. The NR has decided it can live with him.
18 posted on
12/15/2007 10:32:32 AM PST by
kjo
To: linuxster
The conservative endorsements continue to pile up. Who will be the first to call Judge Bork a RINO? Romney is the real deal.
22 posted on
12/15/2007 10:36:18 AM PST by
Bluestateredman
(Self-sufficiency is the American Way)
To: All
1. I’m a proud Freeper
2. I’m for Mitt
3. I’ve been around here long enough to know that Freepers are NOT mainstream conservatives - not that there’s anything wrong with that...
23 posted on
12/15/2007 10:38:03 AM PST by
Scarchin
(+)
To: linuxster
Bump.
Non-evangelical conservatives are beginning to realize that they have nothing to fear from Romney. Romney is wise and disciplined enough not to let his private religious beliefs dictate his policy and decisions as president.
Huckabee wants to force his peculiar brand of Christianity on the world through the power of the United States government and pay for it with money extorted from taxpayers who know far better than government how to exercise genuine Christian compassion.
There is a festering malignancy of religious intolerance and smug self-righteousness in Huckabee's candidacy that mainstream conservatives find disturbing in a way that they do not find Romney's "odd" beliefs disturbing.
26 posted on
12/15/2007 10:42:09 AM PST by
JCEccles
To: linuxster
I am supporting him because he is electable and because he is not Hillary.
I also just like the guy, and sometimes personality and character matter.
This is not the year for republicans to staunchly fight for the next Ronald Reagan. It is the year to stop Hillary.
27 posted on
12/15/2007 10:44:29 AM PST by
Semper911
("We can stand here like the French, or we can do something about it." -Marge Simpson)
To: linuxster
30 posted on
12/15/2007 10:48:11 AM PST by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: linuxster
Is Romney becoming the choice of mainstream conservatives? Yeah, him and Chris Dodd.
31 posted on
12/15/2007 10:49:11 AM PST by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: linuxster
Um, looking at the polls -- no, he isn't becoming the choice of conservatives.
Mitt Wit wouldn't even be an upper-tier candidate if not for his money and the fact New Hampshire is in his own backyard. The rise of Huckabee is a response to how unimpressive Romney and Giuliani are to the conservative base.
And, he has a Mormon problem in addition to a liberal record that makes him as unelectable as any candidate running.
36 posted on
12/15/2007 11:24:52 AM PST by
Ol' Sparky
(Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
To: linuxster
I’d have to add my “no” to the list.
39 posted on
12/15/2007 11:31:43 AM PST by
Ingtar
(The LDS problem that Romney is facing is not his religion, but his recent Liberal Definitive Stands.)
To: linuxster
I’d have to add my “no” to the list.
40 posted on
12/15/2007 11:31:44 AM PST by
Ingtar
(The LDS problem that Romney is facing is not his religion, but his recent Liberal Definitive Stands.)
To: linuxster
42 posted on
12/15/2007 11:32:30 AM PST by
meadsjn
(Hey Spock, round off, partner!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson