Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Broken Compass
www.takimag.com ^ | December 14, 2007 | Tom Piatak

Posted on 12/14/2007 7:33:13 AM PST by Thorin

The Broken Compass

Posted by Tom Piatak on December 14, 2007

It seems fitting that Hollywood has chosen to observe Christmas in the year Christopher Hitchens’ atheist manifesto became a best-seller by releasing The Golden Compass, a movie based on the first volume of a fantasy trilogy His Dark Materials by another angry British atheist, Philip Pullman. Lest there be any doubt what Pullman’s objective is, he told the Washington Post in 2001 that “I’m trying to undermine the basis of Christian belief” and the Sydney Morning Herald in 2003 that “My books are about killing God.”

Pullman, in fact, is the perfect representative of today’s post-Christian Britain: contemptuous of the literary tradition in which he writes, filled with hatred for the basis of his civilization, and advocating the displacement of traditional morality by unbridled sexual license and an assortment of PC platitudes. Pullman has dismissed The Lord of the Rings, the greatest of all fantasy novels and one of the monumental creations of the 20th century, as “fundamentally an infantile work” and a “trivial book.” He has described C. S. Lewis’ beloved Chronicles of Narnia as “morally loathsome,” and even lobbied against making the Narnia books into a movie, telling the BBC in October 2005 that Lewis’ tales were “a peevish blend of racist, misogynistic and reactionary prejudice.” And Pullman, like so many of the angry new atheists, has a deep hatred for the institution that did more to create the West than any other, the Catholic Church. He named the villainous organization against which his heroes battle “the Magisterium” —the name used for the teaching authority of the Catholic Church—and dismisses Tolkien precisely because he was a Catholic. As Pullman told MTV on November 1, 2007, The Lord of the Rings is “trivial” because “for Tolkien, the Catholic, the Church had the answers, the Church was the source of all truth, so Lord of the Rings does not touch those deep questions.” There was a time Hollywood observed Christmas by giving us It’s a Wonderful Life and Miracle on 34th Street; now we get atheist propaganda disguised as children’s literature instead.

So far, so bad. What made this modern Christmas story even worse was the initially supine attitude of an organization which ought to warn Catholics of the dangers posed to the souls of their children by such as Pullman, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Even though The Golden Compass has generally been panned by secular movie reviewers—and one wag has dubbed it “the Chronicles of Yawnia” – the USCCB’s own movie reviewer, Harry Forbes, inexplicably gave the film a gushing review. In his review, Forbes burbled that the film is “Lavish, well-acted, and fast-paced,” “the effects are beautifully realized,” and “there’s hardly a dull moment,” and pronounced the whole film “intelligent and well crafted entertainment.” In fact, Forbes even claimed that “to the extent, moreover, that Lyra and her allies are taking a stand on behalf of free will in opposition to the coercive force of the Magisterium, they are of course acting entirely in harmony with Catholic teaching. The heroism and self-sacrifice that they demonstrate provide appropriate moral lessons for viewers.” Predictably, New Line Cinemas put together ads proclaiming that the Catholic bishops had found the film to be “in harmony with Catholic teaching,” in order to help expose more children to Pullman’s proselytizing atheism. The moral lesson applicable to Pullman is actually the one Jesus provided in Chapter 18 of St. Matthew’s Gospel: “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.”

The USCCB’s review was, at best, bizarrely naïve. Forbes dismissed “Pullman’s putative motives” and suggested the answer to the question, “Is Pullman trying to undermine anyone’s belief in God?” was unimportant, without ever discussing Pullman’s express intent “to undermine the basis of Christian belief.” At the very least, before recommending this movie to Catholic parents and their children, Forbes should have told them what Pullman was up to. But Forbes doesn’t believe in discouraging children from reading atheist agitprop: “Rather than banning the movies or books, parents might instead take the opportunity to talk through any thorny philosophical issues with their teens.” Somehow, one doubts that either the USCCB or Hollywood studios would have taken such a benign view of Pullman if his villainous organization were named “The Synagogue,” his villains wore rabbinical rather than clerical garb, and he had been quoted as saying “I’m trying to undermine the basis of Jewish belief” and “my books are about killing Yahweh.” Opponents of bigotry would have been outraged—and rightly so. Had the film’s opening been accompanied by a psychopath’s shooting spree at synagogues (see the Dec. 9 massacre at two Colorado church facilities), the media would have been convulsed with discussion of a putative connection between these two events.

Of course, if The Golden Compass is a commercial success, sales of the books will soar, and the two succeeding books in the trilogy will become films. Forbes even recognized this: “The religious themes of the later books may be more prominent in the follow-up films which [director Chris] Weitz has vowed will be less watered down.” In fact, Weitz has said that “though I saw it as my duty to build the franchise of His Dark Materials on as solid a grounding as I could, it would all be in vain if the second and third films did not have the intellectual depth and iconoclasm of the second and third books…. The religious themes in the second and third books can’t be minimized without destroying the spirit of these books.” Will the USCCB’s film reviewers give their imprimatur to those films as well? Judging from Forbes’ review, it’s impossible to see how the USCCB’s blessing could be withheld on the basis of Pullman’s aggressive atheism alone. After all, parents can always “take the opportunity to talk through any thorny philosophical issues with their teens.”

The USCCB’s review captures in microcosm the dominant malady of the West: an unwillingness to defend one’s own against even open and obvious enemies. The poor immigrants and their offspring who scrimped and saved to build the myriad churches, schools, convents, and universities that dot Catholic America would have been shocked by bishops who, through the bureaucrats they employ, effectively recommended that parents expose their children to cinematic atheism. After all, those bishops began the daunting task of creating a Catholic school system because they feared that the cultural Protestantism then found in American public schools would undermine the faith of Catholic children they regarded as their highest duty to safeguard.

Rather than hoping to appease a hostile culture, the American Catholic bishops used to try to shape that culture. And they even sometimes succeeded, by exercising moral courage. For example, the bishops deserve at least some credit for Hollywood’s Golden Age, which was the result of creative genius tempered by morality. The Catholic moral pressure applied to Hollywood then forced Hollywood to eschew sex and graphic violence, and instead use good stories to attract audiences. The Hollywood moguls of those days knew that if they produced moral filth, Catholics would not patronize it and the film would fail. Alas, Hollywood has no such inhibitions today, in part because the American bishops as a group are no longer willing to confront Hollywood, and in part because the bishops have ceded authority to USCCB bureaucrats all too likely to produce absurd pronouncements such as the Forbes review of The Golden Compass.

Fortunately, there is a somewhat happy ending to this story. The Golden Compass opened to a disappointing box office, no doubt in part because many lay Catholics and other Christians have been spreading the word among parents that Philip Pullman is no C. S. Lewis or J. R. R. Tolkien, but rather a “Pied Piper of Atheism,” in the words of Sandra Miesel and Peter Vere. Some Catholic bishops, including the bishops of La Crosse, Wisconsin and Austin, Texas, have begun warning their flocks about Pullman. And, after I began writing this article, the USCCB even pulled the Forbes review from its website. Which is all to the good. But until the American bishops as a whole begin emulating their forebears, it is likely that our culture will be shaped less and less by Christianity and more and more by those who, like Pullman, despise Christianity and the civilization it created.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: atheism; goldencompass; hollywood; moviereview
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Thorin

Like many of you, I have received several chain-letter emails warning me of this movie, and I mostly shrugged them off, - thinking I was seeing the same senseless hysteria I was seeing when the first Harry Potter movie was coming out. — But after listening to Michael Medved’s review on this movie, I am dead set against seeing this piece of anti-Christian garbage.
Medved came out in strong defense of the Harry Potter movies, but he said he could not do so on this one.
His review, back up everything that is being said about the anti-Christian content and the blatantly anti-Christian writer of the books. Even though the movie is a watered down version of the book, Medved seemed horrified by the content- for example the “good characters” in the movie each had a demon and that was a “good thing”, and the bad people, The Church, were set on casting out or destroying the demons. Medved was dead serious when he said young minds could honestly come out of this movie, wishing they had a demon, even buying demon toys if they came out and they probably will if this movie is a hit.


21 posted on 12/14/2007 7:56:44 AM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twigs

I guess that’s all they have left after Antony Flew decided he would reject atheism.


22 posted on 12/14/2007 7:59:35 AM PST by ari-freedom (Mitt Romney. He may be a liberal but he's the prettiest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

My wife and I saw it, and we liked it, so did the rest of the audience judging by the comments afterwards. Neither we, nor anyone we talked to, found anything offensive in it at all.


23 posted on 12/14/2007 8:01:28 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
The Golden Compass might get smashed by the escapist twins “Alvin and the Chipmunks”, and “I am Legend”. I won’t be surprised if what you say comes to pass.

It would be nice to have Compass drop to 3 or 4 this weekend (if Enchanted can hang in there some more).

Actually, I am Legend looks stupid, like a slick but bad ripoff/remake, but it's got Will Smith, so it'll probably open well.

24 posted on 12/14/2007 8:18:01 AM PST by Tanniker Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven
Christianity has prevailed for over 2000 years despite far worse attacks and it'll survive this piss-ant too.

Christianity yes. The souls of the children? Not so sure.

25 posted on 12/14/2007 8:23:20 AM PST by nina0113 (If fences don't work, why does the White House have one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Thorin
I wish there was some documentation on that:

and even lobbied against making the Narnia books into a movie,

It would be good ammunition to confront the folks who cry censorship when stuff like this is criticized.

26 posted on 12/14/2007 8:49:23 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
My daughter was part of the scouting party. She likes pretty much the same movies I do. She was just “Not that good, wait until it comes out on video.”

I’m the “Get the large popcorn, drink and candy deal” kinda guy. Throw in the kids and their snacks and we are over $40. We can watch it at home for $7 and our own snacks.

I like to go to the movies for the “experience”. The adds and commercials prior to the movie are starting to make me a bit jaded.

I’ll go see “I am Legend” just because I’ve been telling the kids above “The Omega Man” - of course I’ll have the whole gang in tow - and on my dime.

27 posted on 12/14/2007 8:50:47 AM PST by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith
“Actually, I am Legend looks stupid, like a slick but bad ripoff/remake, but it’s got Will Smith, so it’ll probably open well.”

Actually it is a remake, the third such movie. The last one was “The Omega Man”. Moses played the lead role. A little heavy on the Cheese but OK. Mathious (SP) was the bad guy and “It was all God’s Fault.”

28 posted on 12/14/2007 8:54:06 AM PST by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Thorin

I liked this line.

“There was a time Hollywood observed Christmas by giving us It’s a Wonderful Life and Miracle on 34th Street; now we get atheist propaganda disguised as children’s literature instead.”

How absolutely ignorant do we have to be to allow Hollywood to come along and undermine the heritage and thoughtful teaching we provide our children all their lives and make us pay for it also.

We send men to war to fight for our freedom and we (oh home front ones whose freedom is being protected) ignorantly allow the movies to ply us all with anti-faith, anti-god junk and we pay them to do it.

We defend nothing but expect our soldiers to give their lives to keep us safe.


29 posted on 12/14/2007 9:06:48 AM PST by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

It’s just my wife and I, and we always go to the early, cheap showings. We enoyed this movie.


30 posted on 12/14/2007 9:07:00 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
They took the offensive parts out of the movie with the intent to hook an audience for the rest of the trilogy if you read what the director has said concerning his goals for this movie. They fully intended to put the religious parts back into the last two movies if they get made.

Read the books and see for yourself just how offensive they are and who you have given money to. If you still support it then you do it fully informed.

31 posted on 12/14/2007 9:10:54 AM PST by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Here’s a link on Pullman attacking the idea of making Narnia into a movie: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4347226.stm


32 posted on 12/14/2007 9:12:20 AM PST by Thorin ("I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Thorin

Thank you. Again we see who the real censors are.


33 posted on 12/14/2007 9:13:40 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76

Cold Mountain was a good film.


34 posted on 12/14/2007 9:15:37 AM PST by Badeye (Free Willie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: twigs

You could say there is a great falling away taking place before our very eyes. Beware of the Emerging Church heresy!

A good 3-part article about the Emerging Church starts here:

http://www.svchapel.org/Resources/Articles/read_articles.asp?ID=122

More articles here:

http://www.understandthetimes.org/ec/exposingec.shtml


35 posted on 12/14/2007 9:21:40 AM PST by Abigail Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Thorin
Pullman wants to take Nietzsche to the bank...
36 posted on 12/14/2007 9:22:50 AM PST by Blind Eye Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paved Paradise

Good points.

And why do they jump on us when we try and defend the God that want to ignore or destroy?

Why would atheists care what we believe? Are they jealous of the fact that believers have eternal life waiting for them and they have eternal something else?

If they are so happy is their non-belief why must they try and destroy God or Christ from the believers? It does not affect them. They put themselves out of the realm of control by God here as God will banish them in the afterlife same as they banished Him here.


37 posted on 12/14/2007 9:23:28 AM PST by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Abigail Adams

I’m in a Christian bookclub that is part of a solid, evangelical church. But the past several years, I’ve noticed that most of the books have been from the emerging church. It has been only me and one other man—both of us are Calvinists—who stand up against this. One of these men is a leader in our church. It grieves my heart. These people are honest and intelligent, solid. After reading our last book earlier this month, I went to a local Reformed bookstore to stock up on the basics so that I could return better informed. I will take a look at your links. Thank you.


38 posted on 12/14/2007 9:28:51 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: twigs

Well apparently you were attracted to buy their books and that is one of their goals.

Not chastizing you but it always amazes me to see that people will study and read any “dangerous” book but they won’t read the Bible. Or they put biblical teachings on the same level as the teachings of an atheist and weigh each.

People are so weird.

We have the opportunity to talk to the creator of the universe by simple prayer and yet this fact has to be torn down in lieu of non-belief with nothing for our eternity - only giving us this one life.

How could any such tripe compare to what God gives us?

Yet, we still have those that will delve in the wonders of the atheists and ignore respecting and defending our faith.


39 posted on 12/14/2007 9:30:31 AM PST by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lady Heron

I will comment on the other movies as I see them. As for the removed offensive parts, I wouldn’t know because I didn’t see any. I have no desire to read the books, I just went to see an entertaining movie, that’s all I’m commenting on.


40 posted on 12/14/2007 9:30:44 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson