Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A guy on the radio was stumping for GOOOH.com What do you think of the plan?
GOOOH.com ^

Posted on 12/13/2007 5:52:21 PM PST by rvoitier

A plan to replace career politicians with everyday people.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: careerpoliticians; elections; government
It sounds interesting.

The guy (don't remember his name) was on the Walton&Johnson radio program today (real Reagan conservatives) and laid out a plan to replace the fat cats with "normal" people.

Please give it a read and post what you think. Thanks.

1 posted on 12/13/2007 5:52:23 PM PST by rvoitier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

Discussed here many times, poor idea. Talk about chaos and flights of fancy elections.


2 posted on 12/13/2007 5:53:49 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

Dynachrome for Emperor!


3 posted on 12/13/2007 5:54:55 PM PST by dynachrome (Immigration without assimilation means the death of this nation~Captainpaintball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Sorry about that. I did a search but it came up empty.

How does that commercial go?
Need to get away?

4 posted on 12/13/2007 5:55:58 PM PST by rvoitier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier
Its been a while, search isn’t always good if someone doesn’t tag the article. This will give you some background on the discussions.

http://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=site:freerepublic.com+goooh&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

5 posted on 12/13/2007 5:57:58 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier
This sounds like the personification of something William F. Buckley, Jr. said many years ago. To wit: "I would rather be governed by the first 500 names in the Boston phone book than the entire staff and faculty of Harvard".

I tend to agree with Buckley's and GOOOH's sentiments.

Also, I'd like to see the size of the House of Representatives increased to 1000 members.

The Constitution calls for one elected Representative for every 30,000 citizens. Obviously that would mean we would have 10,000 Congress-critters (I think). Which I wouldn't necessarily be opposed to but increasing it to 1000 would be a good start.

6 posted on 12/13/2007 5:58:49 PM PST by Texas Eagle (Could pacifists exist if there weren't people brave enough to go to war for their right to exist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

***it proposes that members of political families, men (or women) with wealth (defined by GOOOH as someone who possesses over $11.5 million in assets - 250 times the median income), and lawyers, be excluded from participating in the system. ***

The above is the reason I would not vote for it. When you start excluding people from participating, youno longer have a “Representative” government. If it doesn’t represent all of the people, it isn’t right. It would be the same as saying “ No artists, no poor, no people without kids, etc” You start excluding, you can’t stop. If you are American, you should be able to participate.

That aside, there might be an exclusion for Lawyers, as they have their own branch of the system already, the Judicial branch.


7 posted on 12/13/2007 6:00:55 PM PST by irishtenor (History was written before God said "Let there be light.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

The upshot to this is that nothing would ever get done unless it was really important.

That would be a very good thing.


8 posted on 12/13/2007 6:09:31 PM PST by Hawk1976 (747 superliners crashed into the WTC on 9/11, Steny Hoyer told me so on 8/7/07.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Also, I'd like to see the size of the House of Representatives increased to 1000 members.

That would mean most of the increase would come from heavily populated liberal areas, do we need that many more socialists in congress? That's a lot of new ear marks.

9 posted on 12/13/2007 6:15:19 PM PST by c-b 1 (Reporting from behind enemy lines, in occupied AZTLAN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier
A plan to replace career politicians with everyday people.

What were career politicians before they became career politicans?

Every day people?

10 posted on 12/13/2007 6:16:19 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

I had some goooh on my shoe.
I had stepped in poo.
What to do?
Pee-yew!


11 posted on 12/13/2007 6:17:17 PM PST by humblegunner (My KungFu is ten times power.©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier; Zechariah_8_13

I think it’s a good idea.


12 posted on 12/13/2007 6:17:41 PM PST by VoiceOfBruck (for a good time, call vobns.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

Not sure I like GOOOH...but term limits works for me.


13 posted on 12/13/2007 6:53:57 PM PST by TNdandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TNdandelion

Heinlein’s “Starship Trooper”

Only veterans vote and can hold office.

All others have exactly the same rights as veterans but they cannot vote or hold office.

Works for me. If you don’t care enough to serve, then you don’t care enough to decide.


14 posted on 12/13/2007 7:13:01 PM PST by american_ranger (Never ever use DirecTV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier
... a plan to replace the fat cats with "normal" people.

I betcha 10 or 15 years on we would be looking at replacing the "normal" people who had become fat cats with another group of "normal" people. If the underlying process isn't changed it will just produce the same results over and over.

15 posted on 12/13/2007 7:14:03 PM PST by RobinOfKingston (Man, that's stupid...even by congressional standards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

I think it would result in a massive increase in the power of the media to effect legislation.


16 posted on 12/13/2007 7:39:46 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk1976
The upshot to this is that nothing would ever get done unless it was really important. That would be a very good thing.

And, we could remove the air conditioning in the Capitol building. Watch congress head home in June and not return 'til October.

17 posted on 12/13/2007 7:58:50 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

I think “Congressional” housing should be made mandatory. Build housing similiar to military housing...required residency of all members. No limos, commuter bussing to offices, no speaking fees and no lobbying post departure from Washington.


18 posted on 12/13/2007 9:05:25 PM PST by A_Tradition_Continues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
mnehrling,

Thanks for the link re:GOOH discussions on FR.

I guess the time is here where the system is SO broken and people are frustrated to the point of near desperation.

19 posted on 12/13/2007 9:09:50 PM PST by rvoitier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson