Amen to that.
1 posted on
12/13/2007 8:23:38 AM PST by
pissant
To: pissant
2 posted on
12/13/2007 8:24:29 AM PST by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: pissant
Jim Gilchrist here speaks only for Jim Gilchrist, he does not speak for the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps
I had a feeling that was coming.
4 posted on
12/13/2007 8:26:25 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
To: pissant
8 posted on
12/13/2007 8:28:57 AM PST by
lesser_satan
(READ MY LIPS: NO NEW RINOS | FRED THOMPSON - DUNCAN HUNTER '08)
To: pissant
Excellent!
I think Gilchrist is unstable.
sw
9 posted on
12/13/2007 8:30:08 AM PST by
spectre
(spectre's wife)
To: pissant
the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps (MCDC), the nation's largest Minuteman organization, is a 501(C)4 non-profit organization and cannot and does not endorse any candidate for public office keywords....cannot endorse
oh well...if only more people were on this site, and not listening to the old media.
Oh silly me...the old media represents the thoughts of all conservatives with their views and coverage of the candidates on the Republican side. Excuse me I have to go throw up now!
10 posted on
12/13/2007 8:30:41 AM PST by
From One - Many
(Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk. I Will Be Voting for Mr. Duncan Hunter, fellow FReepers.)
To: pissant
This member certainly DOES NOT endorse Huckabee - he’d be the very LAST candidate I’d “endorse” were I in charge of any “non-profit” 501c3 group.
11 posted on
12/13/2007 8:30:54 AM PST by
zerosix
(Native Sunflower)
To: pissant
Huckabee should be able to adapt his position to what he hears voters saying. I think it proves the irrational anger behind the anti-illegal immigration arguments.
Which of the candidates has not radically adapted their positions?
Please do not tell me Ron Paul because I do not care.
12 posted on
12/13/2007 8:31:32 AM PST by
lonestar67
(Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
To: pissant
Well and truly said...timely too.
13 posted on
12/13/2007 8:31:57 AM PST by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
Some background info (it's from Wikipedia, so take it for what it's worth):
The Minuteman Project's board of directors removed Gilchrist as head of the Minuteman Project amid allegations of fraud and financial mismanagement. In a May 2007 interview, Gilchrist claimed: "Im the President and always was. I got the corporation back. I have the right to the web site, the bank account, everything. We are back in the same position as we were prior to the hijacking." These claims by Gilchrist, though, do not appear to match the judge's ruling. Judge "Wilkinson issued an interim ruling barring the board members from spending Minuteman Project donations until Gilchrists lawsuit is resolved. Wilkinson also rejected Gilchrists request for a temporary restraining order that would have restored Gilchrist to power until the case is decided." In April of 2007, Gilchrist announced the formation of a new non-profit corporation, named Jim Gilchrists Minuteman Project, Inc.
In other words, Gilchrist's so-called "Minuteman Project" is a phony.
14 posted on
12/13/2007 8:32:36 AM PST by
jmyrlefuller
(The Associated Press: The most dangerous news organization in America.[TM])
To: pissant
This whole statement is ambiguous, because two separate matters are involved.
1) As a legal matter, an officer or member of a tax-free foundation must make all political endorsements personally, or risk offending the IRS and losing tax exempt status. Therefore, by legal definition, the endorsement is private, not on behalf of the organization. Nevertheless, in the normal course of things, the members of the organization and sympathizers will give the endorsement due weight.
2) As a matter of actual belief or opinion. Thus an officer of an organization might give a political endorsement that the members did not agree with or could not accept. When Pat Robertson endorsed Rudy Giuliani, I would hope that his followers would continue to respect him but would NOT follow his lead in this endorsement. They would conclude that he was still a good man but mistaken.
My personal conclusion is that Jim Gilchrist is certainly mistaken, and by endorsing Huckabee has betrayed the basic principles of his organization. Whether he was bought, or whether he was sincerely mistaken, I don’t yet know. Huckabee is a spellbinding talker, and it’s possible that he pulled the wool over Gilchrest’s eyes, as he has done with a goodly number of southern Evangelicals.
We can hope they will all come to their senses before it’s too late, and they find they have a second Jimmy Carter on their hands.
16 posted on
12/13/2007 8:39:07 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; fieldmarshaldj; Travis McGee
18 posted on
12/13/2007 8:50:34 AM PST by
lesser_satan
(READ MY LIPS: NO NEW RINOS | FRED THOMPSON - DUNCAN HUNTER '08)
To: pissant
24 posted on
12/13/2007 9:46:20 AM PST by
bmwcyle
(BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,.......BOMB, BOMB IRAN)
To: pissant; All
I posted this yesterday. I am shocked at both Gilchrist and Simcox. I just don’t know anymore.
:(
“Talk about strange bedfellows. Consider Barry Goldwater Jr.; Minutemen founder Chris Simcox; Democratic State Rep. Pete Rios; and Carlos Flores, head of the Mexican General Consulate, together at a table to talk immigration over sandwiches.
And earlier in the day, Simcox, a controversial figure who is credited and criticized for being the first to organize a citizen border patrol, made what some found to be stunning statements: He supports public education for the children of illegal immigrants and sees the fix as not just an issue of enforcement, but of reforming Mexico’s economy and basing the number of U.S. visas on the nation’s labor supply.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1938692/posts
25 posted on
12/13/2007 10:22:10 AM PST by
dynachrome
(Immigration without assimilation means the death of this nation~Captainpaintball)
To: pissant
27 posted on
12/13/2007 1:56:02 PM PST by
Kevmo
(We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
To: pissant
Stay tuned. There is more on this. I will post it in just a second. Very good stuff, pissant.
From AiT, overseas.....
28 posted on
12/13/2007 5:13:43 PM PST by
AmericanInTokyo
(DUNCAN HUNTER: SOLID! On; Illegals, N. Korea, Iran. Iraq, Economy, WOT, China, Business)
To: pissant
I knew there was something strange about Gilchrist’s endorsement.
34 posted on
12/13/2007 5:30:19 PM PST by
TheLion
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson