Posted on 12/13/2007 6:53:54 AM PST by jdm
VOTERS WILL never elect Bill Clinton's wife as president of the United States. They may yet elect Hillary Clinton - if she makes the case.
It's tempting to believe Bill Clinton is the one super surrogate who can make the difference in his wife's presidential campaign. A new CBS/New York Times national poll indicated that 44 percent of Democratic primary voters said they were more likely to vote for Hillary Clinton because of her husband. Only 1 percent said they were more likely to vote for Barack Obama because of his celebrity backer, Oprah Winfrey.
But people don't always tell pollsters the truth. And they answer only the questions asked of them.
What if they were asked whether the former president once associated with the lyrics "Don't stop thinking about tomorrow" now reminds them of the past?
What if they were asked whether Bill Clinton's presence on the campaign trail causes them to think of Hillary Clinton more as a wife and former first lady than a candidate with personal accomplishments of her own?
And what if they were asked about comments made by a husband that periodically create controversy for his wife, the candidate? Might they label them subconscious sabotage?
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
Good news for us.
“...But people don’t always tell pollsters the truth. And they answer only the questions asked of them.”
The main reason I don’t pay attention to polls.
And what if they associate Hillary with Bill clinton’s eight years of do-nothing Presidency? What if they associate Hillary with numerous crimes, shattered lives, mysterious numerous deaths, misuse of government agents and agencies, the sale of nuclear warhead technology in exchange for Chinese cash to support her party? What if they associate Hillary with a downsized military, an ineffective collaboration between intelligence agencies, and the allowance of Al Qaeda to build strength wjhile the Clintons dithered and held parties for Hollywood celebrities?
“It’s tempting to believe Bill Clinton is the one super surrogate who can make the difference in his wife’s presidential campaign.”
It’s “tempting” if you’re hoping she’ll win. No bias here...
BJ only won because of Ross Perot and Hillary’s negatives are at 50%. She sucks, she loses.
America has had enough of the sad sack duo.......
BJ only won because of Ross Perot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
True, what would be a fitting punishment for the little jug-eared billionaire?
She also has the personality of a bucket of s-holes.
When she loses I’d hate to be in Bill’s shoes.
And for that we must be very thankful.
His major concern is gaining access to more your chicks.
I find it laughable anyone thought he could, given he never once acheived 50 percent of the national vote.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Well, I had thought that nearly all of HRC’s liberal backers were really just wanting “Bill” back and expect him to “run” things when she “can’t”.
"Psst! Antonio. You know Hillary HAD to oppose licensing latinos to protect
The Clinton Legacy. You still gonna fix me up with hot latina babes, right?"
"Ai dunno, Beeley. Ai dun't theenk hot mamasitas wanna
tango wit you undah da sheets, enymore, Beeley.
But chu can still have da name of my denteesta."
Is that true? Didn’t he campaign for Mary Landrieu in 2002, maybe he did not? But GHWB campaigned for Mrs. Terrell.
BJ only won because of Ross Perot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
True, what would be a fitting punishment for the little jug-eared billionaire?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
an eternity with Bill and Hillaries companionship?
clintons CHEAT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.