Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge says California can regulate greenhouse gases from cars
AP via SFGate ^ | 12/12/7 | SAMANTHA YOUNG, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 12/12/2007 10:58:16 AM PST by SmithL

SACRAMENTO, (AP) -- A federal judge Wednesday rejected automakers' lawsuit against California, saying the state has the authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles.

The ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Anthony Ishii clears one of the hurdles in California's effort to regulate tailpipe emissions from cars, trucks and sports utility vehicles.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: activistjudge; automakers; commiefornia; goebbelswarming; gorebullwarning; judges
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

1 posted on 12/12/2007 10:58:16 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Ishii, Anthony W.
Born 1946 in Santa Ana, CA

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court, Eastern District of California
Nominated by William J. Clinton on February 12, 1997, to a seat vacated by Robert E. Coyle; Confirmed by the Senate on October 9, 1997, and received commission on October 14, 1997.

Education:
Reedley Junior College, A.S., 1966

University of the Pacific School of Pharmacy, Ph.G., 1970

University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law, J.D., 1973

Professional Career:
Deputy city attorney, City Attorney's Office, Sacramento, California, 1975
Deputy public defender, Public Defender's Office, County of Fresno, California, 1979
Private practice, Fresno, California, 1979-1983
Justice court judge, Parlier-Selma Judicial District, County of Fresno, California, 1983-1993
Municipal court judge, Central Valley Municipal Court, County of Fresno, California, 1994-1997

Race or Ethnicity: Asian American

Gender: Male

2 posted on 12/12/2007 10:58:38 AM PST by SmithL (I don't do Barf Alerts, you're old enough to read and decide for yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Go for it...IDIOTS!


3 posted on 12/12/2007 10:59:30 AM PST by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I have a question regarding this whole “greenhouse gas” regulation thing:

Will one of the side effects of these regulations necessarily mean higher gas mileage, or are we talking about something else?

In other words, is one of the side effects of the insanity of “counting carbon” actually using less imported oil?


4 posted on 12/12/2007 11:00:46 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The government of California will have the state’s economy reduced to that of a third world country right about the time it’s third world neighbor to the south completes it’s re-annexation .... perfect


5 posted on 12/12/2007 11:04:39 AM PST by tx_eggman ("Believing without loving turns the best of creeds into a weapon of oppression" Eugene Peterson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Race or Ethnicity: Asian American

Ah, he's prejudiced against American made SUVs and Trucks.

6 posted on 12/12/2007 11:04:46 AM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier home after 15 months in the Triagle of death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I would love to see automakers refuse to sell cars there. Let the idiots drive to Nevada or Oregon to buy vehicles.


7 posted on 12/12/2007 11:05:46 AM PST by MeSpikeLibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Now the auto industry can quit selling their products in California.

L

8 posted on 12/12/2007 11:06:15 AM PST by Lurker ( Comparing moderate islam to extremist islam is like comparing smallpox to ebola.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

it is california’s right to regulate what it wants... the constitution is clear... those not enumerated or restricted to are left to the states or the people...

the people will suffer and the state will be the big loser in the long run... i wouldn’t put up with it long and leave... then the rising taxes and lower population will bring down the house of carbon credits...

too bad there are no real leaders anymore.

teeman


9 posted on 12/12/2007 11:06:43 AM PST by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

It’s all about getting you out of your car by any means possible.


10 posted on 12/12/2007 11:06:49 AM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
They'll ban the automobile. That's the only way to reduce CO2 emissions.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

11 posted on 12/12/2007 11:06:59 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Without oil and gasoline the people of the United States would starve, freeze, die of heat and many other things. There would be no food and no way to get to the store and if you had a horse the store would not have food because there would not be gasoline to deliver the food.

If we go back to living as out ancestors did in the 1500s then we need to raise out own food and their will not be any way to store it as the freezer and frig will not work without electricity and there will not be any electricity without oil, or gas.

So it the idiots in California want to kill the people living there then that is their business.

12 posted on 12/12/2007 11:07:08 AM PST by YOUGOTIT (The Greatest Threat to our Security is the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
If California keeps going the way it is going, then this will be the only legal and affordable mode of transportation available for its citizens...


13 posted on 12/12/2007 11:11:41 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (“We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!” --Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
...expecting anything else from the ninth circus would have been a mistake
14 posted on 12/12/2007 11:12:34 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

It is clear to see the reasons behind the dumbing down agenda of the public schools.

Not that anyone remembers, but the catalytic converter manufactures CO2, just like it was intended to do.

We would reduce CO2 emissions by billions of tons if we remove them. How about that?


15 posted on 12/12/2007 11:12:41 AM PST by bill1952 (The right to buy weapons is the right to be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Ah, but does the law also compel manufacturers to sell vehicles in California? Yes, it is a big market and most companies will decide to play there, but somewhere there is a point where the ROI just won’t justify it.


16 posted on 12/12/2007 11:17:28 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

California could reduce a good deal of its CO2 immissions on its on without forcing the rest of the country to bear the cost of its polution problem. Two suggestions for California lawmakers:

1. Raise the tax on gasoline by $2.00 a gallon. It has been proven that higher gas prices result in less consumption. The only way to reduce CO2 from combustion engines is to consume less gas.

2. Stop breathing. All the CO2 that the California legislature exhales would then never again polute the air, and the whole country would be better off!


17 posted on 12/12/2007 11:17:43 AM PST by HoustonTech (Fred Tax Calculator: http://gil.yoder.home.comcast.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Now the auto industry can quit selling their products in California.

Right on. And how about foreign car sales. They could easily tell California to go to hell.

18 posted on 12/12/2007 11:18:19 AM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I don’t see how the contitution would possibly prohibit states from regulating pollution ...i.e. California can be stupid if they want to.


19 posted on 12/12/2007 11:19:07 AM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
What are they going to do, convert all the agricultural checkpoints at the state border into vehicle inspection stations, and then keep the riff-raff out?

-PJ

20 posted on 12/12/2007 11:21:07 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson