Skip to comments.
Giuliani says cops ordered Nathan's security
Newsday ^
| 12/10/07
| Craig Gordon
Posted on 12/12/2007 10:49:02 AM PST by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Sure, Rudy, sure.
1
posted on
12/12/2007 10:49:04 AM PST
by
pissant
To: pissant
I’m sure the cops also ordered him to spread the expenses across a number of obscure small agencies, so that it would be more obscured from public view.
The “hero” of 9/11 is sounding more and more Clintonesque every minute.
2
posted on
12/12/2007 10:50:58 AM PST
by
dashing doofus
(Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
To: dashing doofus
The hero of 9/11 is sounding more and more Clintonesque every minute.Yep, talk about a Trojan Horse. I'd feel better if he wanted to run against Hillary to at least challenge her on his real party line, Democrat, and join the fray in the Democrat nomination race.
3
posted on
12/12/2007 10:52:59 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
To: pissant
More New York corruption. Bernie Kerik wasn’t the only skeleton lying in Rudy’s closet, and I’m sure that more of these revelation will soon come.
4
posted on
12/12/2007 10:53:56 AM PST
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(“We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!” --Duncan Hunter)
To: pissant
But the former mayor grew defensive when asked whether a hypothetical presidential "mistress" should likewise get Secret Service protection.
I'm sure Bill & Hillary should be the source here. Hillary, since she's now in the drivers seat, may be the deciding vote. I'm sure that Bill, being in the back seat, is busy.
5
posted on
12/12/2007 10:54:14 AM PST
by
K-oneTexas
(I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
To: dashing doofus
“Giuliani said yesterday his then-girlfriend Judith Nathan was entitled to security escorts on the taxpayer’s dime because it was the New York Police Department - not Giuliani - who determined she was in danger”
Read: Donna Hannover was going to KICK HER BUTT!!! That’s why she was in danger.
Moreover, why was Judy “in danger” and not just needed “protection”? There’s a difference b/w “danger” and just plain ‘ol “protection”, doncha know...
6
posted on
12/12/2007 10:54:38 AM PST
by
SilvieWaldorfMD
(Hard lesson learned in the 1980's: "Never perm and dye your hair at the same time")
To: pissant
Rudy
7
posted on
12/12/2007 10:55:04 AM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! Duncan Hunter is a Cosponsor.)
To: pissant
And Rudy put them in the position of having to make that choice.
8
posted on
12/12/2007 10:55:09 AM PST
by
NavVet
(If you don't defend conservatism in the Primary, you won't have it to defend in the Election)
To: Man50D
Was it a coincidence that this “baggage” had some of the colors of the rainbow flag on some of the pieces of luggage?
9
posted on
12/12/2007 10:58:47 AM PST
by
SilvieWaldorfMD
(Hard lesson learned in the 1980's: "Never perm and dye your hair at the same time")
To: pissant
we sure need another President that keeps his thoughts behind his zipper.
10
posted on
12/12/2007 10:59:37 AM PST
by
JayAr36
(What good has Islam provided for the World?)
To: 1Old Pro
God help us all if the choice boils down to Rudy vs. The Beast.....
11
posted on
12/12/2007 10:59:52 AM PST
by
dashing doofus
(Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
To: pissant
So does ever woman who is f_______ a married man in NYC get police protection?
12
posted on
12/12/2007 11:02:08 AM PST
by
trumandogz
(Hunter Thompson 2008)
To: pissant
Why the hell do politicians believe taxpayers are financially responsible for the care and keeping of their damned skanks while committing adultery?
If they’re not “dipping their pen” in the company ink well — they’re trying to elevate their non-employee skanks to a level of respect or worth they’re clearly not entitled to...
Rudy may have some fine attributes -— but character and class aren’t among them....
13
posted on
12/12/2007 11:05:40 AM PST
by
river rat
(Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: K-oneTexas
If hillary wins, we’ll undoubtedly have a presidential mistress.
To: pissant
15
posted on
12/12/2007 11:22:45 AM PST
by
Pistolshot
(Never argue with stupid people, they just bring you down to their level and beat you with experience)
To: pissant
Transparent lies. He dug himself in deeper with this insulting defense.
16
posted on
12/12/2007 11:25:17 AM PST
by
beckett
(Amor Fati)
To: pissant
I’ve been to Nathans’ at Coney Island, and frankly don’t know what all the fuss is about - A little extra security for a NYC icon?
What?
Oh.
Nevermind.
17
posted on
12/12/2007 11:33:24 AM PST
by
NY.SS-Bar9
(DR #1692)
To: NY.SS-Bar9
18
posted on
12/12/2007 11:35:15 AM PST
by
jagusafr
("Bugs, Mr. Rico! Zillions of 'em!" - Robert Heinlein)
To: pissant
Rudy!
You’re in a hole!
Stop Digging!
19
posted on
12/12/2007 11:35:29 AM PST
by
Mikey_1962
(Liberals want equality of outcome not opportunity.)
To: SilvieWaldorfMD
Read: Donna Hannover was going to KICK HER BUTT!!! Thats why she was in danger.
LMAO....that was what I was thinking, too. Real nasty chick-fight there...
20
posted on
12/12/2007 11:45:23 AM PST
by
UCFRoadWarrior
(Mike Huckabee values illegals, criminals, and terrorists...Thanks "Values Voters")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson