Agree with that also. We had been told it was a “rifle” and a handgun he carried.
And the rifle was not a shotgun that was firing at the prople in that church.
Don’t we think that this security guard would have seen the perp put a shotgun to his own head or self and blow his own brains out?
The Veteran who was trying to get the firearm from the male security guard said he didn’t know that’s what they had said and that all he knew was the Jeanne kept firing and firing.
The Veteran : “Shoot him again”/in the head/?,,,
Jeanne : “No,,,He’s Dead.”
At this time The Vet grabbed the handgun(found it jammed)
IMHO : Jeanne saw the perp shoot himself as she walked
forward firing at him(marching fire)firing as the foot hits
the ground,,,10-15 rounds as The Vet has said,,,
FOX just reported: “He fired a single bullet into himself.”
Well, IIRC, someone was reported to have taken a "pellet" in the leg. That was early on, and kind of confusing, since they were saying "assault rifle" (ie. underpowered ugly gun.)
You see that term, which has very specific DoD definition, missused more and more. At least the graboids could stick to their own made up term, assault weapon, which is loosely defined as any gun they want to ban, this month anyway.
I mean really, how hard can it be for a reporter to ask the simple question, "What type of gun or guns did the killer use? Of course "shotgun" doesn't exactly fit the agenda, not yet anyway.