1 posted on
12/08/2007 2:43:23 PM PST by
george76
To: forester; SierraWasp; tubebender; marsh2
The eco- liberals have discovered logging.
2 posted on
12/08/2007 2:45:19 PM PST by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
Lodgepole makes for a pretty cabin, but needs lots and lots of maintenance... I guess it’s better than just letting the trees become a bigger fire hazard or just rotting away...
3 posted on
12/08/2007 2:45:59 PM PST by
xcamel
(FDT/2008)
To: george76
It is surprising that the eco-wackos will allow any tree, dead or alive, to be harvested and converted to capitalistic, economically useful purposes. Were these trees taken from public or private forests?
7 posted on
12/08/2007 3:06:41 PM PST by
Elsiejay
To: george76
8 posted on
12/08/2007 3:09:41 PM PST by
Larry Lucido
(Hunter 2008)
To: george76
I have a friend locally who lives in a log house. He has lots of trouble getting homeowners insurance because of the difficulty in repairing a fire damaged log house.
15 posted on
12/08/2007 6:52:40 PM PST by
whipitgood
(Let's burn some MEXICAN flags!)
To: All
18 posted on
12/08/2007 7:07:25 PM PST by
dighton
To: george76
We have conservancies and public agencies around here that take land under various guises and then log and ranch the land exactly like the prior owners had done that had supposedly justified "protection."
The real difference is that they contribute to leftists and consume taxes instead of paying them. Oh, and they don't contribute to Republicans and pay taxes, like most of the former owners had.
22 posted on
12/08/2007 11:06:33 PM PST by
Carry_Okie
(Duncan Hunter for President)
To: george76
My favorite toys as a child were Lincoln Logs and matches...
23 posted on
12/08/2007 11:07:52 PM PST by
Clemenza
(Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson