Posted on 12/08/2007 6:06:52 AM PST by RDTF
Two commercial jets came within 300 feet of hitting each other at Baltimore-Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport last weekend, federal aviation officials said yesterday.
The incident occurred about 7:25 p.m. Sunday when a Delta Connection regional jet took off and flew over a US Airways Airbus A320 that was landing on a crossing runway, officials said.
Airline representatives said there were 43 passengers on the Delta Connection jet, which is operated by Comair and was headed to Boston. There were 150 passengers on the US Airways jet, which was arriving from Phoenix. No one was hurt on either plane.
The US Airways pilots reported the incident, FAA officials said, adding that the Delta Connection flight crew never saw the other plane.
FAA officials said a controller in the BWI tower improperly issued a takeoff clearance for the Delta Connection flight even though the US Airways plane was approaching the runway. The controller was not identified.
A system that alerts controllers to potential runway collisions sounded, but not in time for the controller to take action, FAA officials said. A representative of the controllers union, the National Air Traffic Controllers Association, declined to comment.
-snip-
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
I'm shocked!!!
The real story here is a passenger plane took off with some empty seats on board.
Every time I fly, I feel like the last fish being stuffed into a sardine can
I flew back from Germany on Air Canada and ended up with a seat empty next to me. It was great.
Landings (runways-to-taxi’s-to-terminal) are what concern me flying.
Was this another one of those “Land and hold short” clearances?
Did everyone wave?
We fly out of BWI all the time. This really gives me a warm fuzzy feeling. BWI is not exactly the most crowded airport in the world, so one wonders what the excuse is for this. . .
"What's the big commotion about? Trains pass within a couple feet of each other every day, and you guys are hassling us about 300' ?
Find some real news to report to the flying public about!"
THe excuse is in the article. And Air traffic controller improperly gave permission for a jet to land when one was taking off.
Wow, they came within 300 feet and “no one was hurt”! I’m shocked that the intersecting force fields didn’t collapse somebodies spleen.
Cajungirl, I did understand that this was the mechanism of the near-miss. I was wondering how the air-traffic controller made such a mistake.
********
True enough about the "busy/crowded" traffic level at BWI...
HOWEVER...
There is a lot of inherent possibilities woven into the multiple-crossing-runway design of the field.
The approach pathways are built to circumvent DCA and IAD (Dulles) to the south -- and bumped up against PHL to the north....
Ergo...
Local controllers have to accept and release traffic from BWI on several rhythms that extend well beyond the field boundaries (spelled - "distracted")...
Throw in the "angles".. and the "mix" of the bigs and the commuters, the corporates and the small general avation users...
My honest and professional [retired "bigs"] opine...
Barring major investment and improvements in the eastern seaboard corridors...
It's only a matter of time...
BWI is in the middle of the air traffic "combat zone"
(Everything North from RIC- Richmond, VA to PWM --Portland, ME.)
"Let's be careful out there..."
--Sgt Esterhaus
You left out nuclear warfare. :=)
Is there an official distance between airliners that is acceptable under these circumstances, e.g. 1,000 feet?
With Tom Tom on the dash board you can navigate your car to the nearest Pizza Parlor after you kids soccer game. Cost? $500 plus shipping and handling!(thank you Billy Mays.) Yet a recent crash on takeoff occurred because the pilots were directed to the wrong runway for takeoff!!!!! With GPS and a laptop, none of these situations would happen. But then you would have to downsize the ATC to its needed stregnth, ZERO! Money and lives would be saved but the union wouldn't allow it!!!
Mind you with GPS and drones in the sky we can drop bombs to within inches of their aimpoint. This technology would allow us to downsize the cockpit crew to ONE! That person would be the emergency backup for the automated system which, God Forbid, would rarely CRASH!
Case closed.
Approach-Landing or Takeoffs one behind the other:
Anything up to big--behind big... normally 3 miles...
Anything up to big--behind "jumbo" or "heavy" big... normally 5 miles...
Runway clearances -- same runway:
Landing traffic completely clear
Take-off traffic: airborne/clear of the surface (and GA - unable to abort/re-land on the same surface)
INTERSECTIONS: Conflicted traffic physically clear BEYOND the intersection
The same way anybody else makes a mistake. When you get a hamburger instead of the cheeseburger you ordered at McDonalds, it not as big a deal though. The person making the mistake was usually distracted. The garden variety idiots usually get sorted out pretty quickly, especially in air traffic control.
I green light at a traffic intersection does not mean “go”. It means “proceed with caution”. Same with “cleared to land” or “cleared for takeoff”. It’s not an invitation to take a mental snooze.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.