Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: najida
Girls cost more (due to dowrys etc) therefore are harder on the family and boys continue the family line.

No, it's the son, not the daughter, that will take in and care for the aging parents.
50 posted on 12/08/2007 4:30:43 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: aruanan

You and I are saying the same thing.

The daughter has less value and costs the family more money. The son has greater value (Passing on the family line, bringing IN money via a dowry AND caring for his parents).

Why anyone bothers with having girls is beyond me ;)


52 posted on 12/08/2007 4:54:49 PM PST by najida (Will you dance at my birthday party?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson