Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thompson vs. Huckabee on Iran
CBS News ^ | 12/07/07 | John Bentley

Posted on 12/07/2007 11:40:21 AM PST by Route66

At a news conference that just wrapped up, Fred Thompson was asked what he thought of Mike Huckabee drawing a blank when asked about recent reports about the National Intelligence Estimate re: Iran.

"Not only is Iran the major long-term threat to our country, the nuclear program is the most important part of the Iran consideration. For a presidential candidate not to know that and not to keep up with that is very suprising," said Thompson.

"These are the kinds of things I've been talking about all of my life. Now, if the American people have other priorities, if they want someone who smiles a lot more than I do, or someone who is a better quipster than I am, who has no experience in these areas, that's for the American people to decide."

Thompson is now en route to Davenport, Iowa.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fred; fredthompson; huckabee; iran; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Thompson is on the trail and taking on Huckabee.
1 posted on 12/07/2007 11:40:22 AM PST by Route66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Route66; Petronski; RockinRight; Politicalmom

LOL. Slap the lib.


2 posted on 12/07/2007 11:42:44 AM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"Not only is Iran the major long-term threat to our country, the nuclear program is the most important part of the Iran consideration. For a presidential candidate not to know that and not to keep up with that is very suprising," said Thompson.

"These are the kinds of things I've been talking about all of my life. Now, if the American people have other priorities, if they want someone who smiles a lot more than I do, or someone who is a better quipster than I am, who has no experience in these areas, that's for the American people to decide."

Now THAT is a sound bite!!

3 posted on 12/07/2007 11:47:11 AM PST by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant

“Speak no ill of another Republican” - Reagan’s law


4 posted on 12/07/2007 11:47:50 AM PST by Walrus (Those who work should eat better than those who do not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Route66

Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t a candidate need at leat 15% of the vote in Iowa. If he doens’t make the cut then his supporters can change their vote.

I hope Fred makes the cut-off as I can easily see him being the #2 vote for many of the other guys (especially Tancredo and Hunter). But that’s only about 2% so he’d need one of the other top guys to miss the mark and have his supporters go for him.


5 posted on 12/07/2007 11:49:22 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Route66
I’m sure than huckster just wants to sing hymns and talk. LOL
6 posted on 12/07/2007 11:49:36 AM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Walrus

He didn’t speak ill of him. He complemented his smile and quick wit. And even says if thats what’s important to you to go ahead and vote for him.

Fred can’t help it that Huck doesn’t know what’s going on with Iran...Huck has to take care of that.


7 posted on 12/07/2007 11:50:55 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I guess Thompson got a “zinger” on Huckabee, but he’s been making these type statements for the last few weeks and his numbers have kept going down and Huckabee’s have kept going up.


8 posted on 12/07/2007 11:51:06 AM PST by MittFan08 (Anybody but McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Walrus
“Speak no ill of another Republican” - Reagan’s law

The huckster is a liberal rino, so it doesn't apply anyway, besides Reagan didn't seem to draw back from taking on Ford did he?

9 posted on 12/07/2007 11:51:28 AM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Route66

Go Fred!


10 posted on 12/07/2007 11:51:51 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
LOL. Slap the lib.

Hey, somebody has to do it. I realize Huckabee did not need to pay much attention to little things like national security and foreign policy issues while he was Governor of Arkansas and he could delete those news items from his daily news summary. But he wants to be leader of the free world now. Jokes won’t cut it on issues like this one.

11 posted on 12/07/2007 11:51:56 AM PST by Route66 (America's Main Street - - - Fred D. Thompson / Consistent Conservative...The One with Gravitas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Walrus

From the man who tried to unseat Gerry Ford with some very unkind words.


12 posted on 12/07/2007 11:52:33 AM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Walrus

Well golly, here I go breaking it.

Rudy is a pr**k.

Romney is a phoney.

Huckabee is a pro-life liberal.

McCain is crazy.

Out of those three, I’d go with the crazy guy.


13 posted on 12/07/2007 11:52:59 AM PST by JRochelle (Thanks to RomneyCare, abortions in MA are at the reduced price of only $50.00!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Walrus
The republican party has slowly moved away from itself and it’s core of conservatism. Reagan’s law would probably read “Speak no ill of fellow conservatives” since many republicans are more like 1980’s democrats than 1980's Republicans.

In that vein when we speak ill of Huckabee, we are covered. He is a Republican, but not a Conservative.

14 posted on 12/07/2007 11:53:35 AM PST by ejonesie22 (In America all people have a right to be wrong, some just exercise it a bit much...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

I count 4 not three.


15 posted on 12/07/2007 11:53:37 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Oops!

I must be crazy too!


16 posted on 12/07/2007 11:54:03 AM PST by JRochelle (Thanks to RomneyCare, abortions in MA are at the reduced price of only $50.00!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jellybean; Politicalmom; girlangler; KoRn; Shortstop7; Lunatic Fringe; Darnright; babygene; ...
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference

WARNING: If you wish to join, be aware that this ping list is EXTREMELY active.

17 posted on 12/07/2007 11:54:18 AM PST by Politicalmom (Huckabee is the GOP's Jimmy Carter. Are you ready for the plundering of your pocketbook?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Walrus
Sorry... that rule died on 2006. This Nation under GOD is far more important than to play nicey nice when rootiemcromneyhuck will destroy this nation... either themselves or by helping hildebeast become President.

LLS

18 posted on 12/07/2007 12:01:15 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims and vote Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MittFan08
When Fred says nothing, he's criticized for doing too little to be noticed. When he says something, he's criticized for "attacking". So what should Fred have said?

“Don’t be hard on Huckabee. He should not be expected to know minutia such as this.”

If no one takes on Huckabee, he will waltz to the nomination without anyone even knowing who and what he is. I’m for the voter being informed of the differences between the candidates. They won't cover Fred on issues of real substance, and an honest comment concerning an opponent at least gets him in the news and gets him noticed.

19 posted on 12/07/2007 12:01:49 PM PST by Route66 (America's Main Street - - - Fred D. Thompson / Consistent Conservative...The One with Gravitas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Walrus

Reagan challenged ford and I’m certain didn’t refrain from commentary on hi opponent. He also left the Democrat party, so who knows what he would make of a flaming Lib like Huck who’s only redeeming grace is that he is socially conservative.

I wont be supporting this guy, and I suspect if enough voters are so foolish to believe Christian = Conservative and nominate him? They’ll have buyer’s remorse.

The sole positive in Huck’s rise is that as much as i dislike him, I know he’s causing the elites in the party fits. Not because he’s not liberal enough for them, but because they can’t tolerate Christians in the party and Huck’s quick rise gives testimony to the fact Christians haven’t appreciated Rudy being shoved down their throats and are retaliating. The elites deserve their heartburn.

Unfortunately, conservatives down on the ground do not.


20 posted on 12/07/2007 12:02:38 PM PST by Soul Seeker (If Fox were part of the VRWC they wouldn’t be shilling for Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson