I stand by my original assertion. In fact, the burden is on you to prove the places mentioned ante-deluge are the same post-deluge.
You seriously expect me to believe eight people, from a local region where distant travel was virtually nonexistent, were such skilled cartographers and geographers that they could accurately identify mountains and the terrain of where they landed after floating upon the water for 150 days? Did they have an anchor? Were the earth’s ocean and wind currents non-existent during the flood?
Hmmm, let’s see. A typical ocean current can move a floating object anywhere from 7-120 km in one day. This means the ark could’ve been pushed by the current anywhere from 1050-18,000 km from its original location during the 150 days it was floating on the water.
Sure, it’s believable it just went up and down - NOT!
Regardless, I don’t believe in a literal flood that covered all the earth, so I don’t really care.
Why??
You seriously expect me to believe ...
I don't expect you to believe anything.
What does your organization say about it?
Fact or fable?