>> Dumond was the target of what certainly appears to be corrupt prosecution. Note that the arresting “peace” officer later died in prison based on charges of corruption.
Bovine excrement. Link to prove your assertion please?
Also — if Dumond was innocent and convicted due only to corruption — why, pray tell, did he kill again shortly after his release? His DNA was under the victims fingernails this time — are you going to chalk that up to corrupt prosecution? Oh yeah, and it was in a different state.
Dumond was bad seed — and Huckabee ignored those who tried to tell him that, and bent his pick to get Dumond released from jail!
HUCKABEE is soft on crime, incompetent to govern — and a liar. Here’s a couple of articles you might want to read, so you have the FACTS and don’t need to make up BS out of thin air:
http://www.arktimes.com/Articles/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=154e1aad-fd18-4efd-8d80-b5dab8559419
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NTcyMTM5YzRiMzVjMjA3MGEwMjUwM2Y3NGJiMzM1YWY=&w=MA==
Your debating style needs some work. I did not make up BS out of thin air. Furthermore, I made no assertions as to Dumond’s guilt in the crimes which were committed after his release. Don’t make up straw men.
Dumond’s case was discussed at great detail on FR during Clinton’s presidency. He was castrated prior to his arrest in an act which the local sheriff seemed to be in collusion. Dumond won a civil case based on his treatment by this sheriff.
I know this is going to be hard for you, but focus on the original case. Can you say “railroaded”? That was certainly the conclusion of the FR community during the ‘90s.