Your debating style needs some work. I did not make up BS out of thin air. Furthermore, I made no assertions as to Dumond’s guilt in the crimes which were committed after his release. Don’t make up straw men.
Dumond’s case was discussed at great detail on FR during Clinton’s presidency. He was castrated prior to his arrest in an act which the local sheriff seemed to be in collusion. Dumond won a civil case based on his treatment by this sheriff.
I know this is going to be hard for you, but focus on the original case. Can you say “railroaded”? That was certainly the conclusion of the FR community during the ‘90s.
>> I did not make up BS out of thin air.
I asked you for links. I don’t see any. Provide some to support your position, or my charge of BS stands.
...or does your preferred debate style involve you asserting facts that you can’t prove?