In the general case I can buy into a lot of what you said. Even in the Dumond case, I can to a point. What concerns me with that case is that there was clearly a problem sheriff. The guy was convicted and did get a very severe sentence. I stated on another thread that I am not sure what the exact facts are on this case, but I am also not sure that anyone could come up with a good set of facts as corrupt as that sheriff and his district seemed to be.
It doesn’t look good in the Dumond case, because Huckabee seemed to think he new better than anyone else and appointed himself the king of early release.
I don’t approve of that.
Sounds like we are pretty well agreed.