Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Governor Mitt Romney's "Faith In America" Address (Transcript)
Rommey for President 2008 ^ | 11/05/07 | Mitt Romney

Posted on 12/06/2007 10:13:20 AM PST by Reaganesque

Thursday, Dec 06, 2007

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT:
Romney Press Shop (857) 288-6390

College Station, TX – Speaking at The George Bush Presidential Library, Governor Romney addressed the American people about his views on religious liberty, our country's grand tradition of religious tolerance and how faith would inform his Presidency.

Governor Romney's "Faith In America" Address (As Prepared For Delivery):

"Thank you, Mr. President, for your kind introduction.

"It is an honor to be here today. This is an inspiring place because of you and the First Lady and because of the film exhibited across the way in the Presidential library. For those who have not seen it, it shows the President as a young pilot, shot down during the Second World War, being rescued from his life-raft by the crew of an American submarine. It is a moving reminder that when America has faced challenge and peril, Americans rise to the occasion, willing to risk their very lives to defend freedom and preserve our nation. We are in your debt. Thank you, Mr. President.

"Mr. President, your generation rose to the occasion, first to defeat Fascism and then to vanquish the Soviet Union. You left us, your children, a free and strong America. It is why we call yours the greatest generation. It is now my generation's turn. How we respond to today's challenges will define our generation. And it will determine what kind of America we will leave our children, and theirs.

"America faces a new generation of challenges. Radical violent Islam seeks to destroy us. An emerging China endeavors to surpass our economic leadership. And we are troubled at home by government overspending, overuse of foreign oil, and the breakdown of the family.

"Over the last year, we have embarked on a national debate on how best to preserve American leadership. Today, I wish to address a topic which I believe is fundamental to America's greatness: our religious liberty. I will also offer perspectives on how my own faith would inform my Presidency, if I were elected.

"There are some who may feel that religion is not a matter to be seriously considered in the context of the weighty threats that face us. If so, they are at odds with the nation's founders, for they, when our nation faced its greatest peril, sought the blessings of the Creator. And further, they discovered the essential connection between the survival of a free land and the protection of religious freedom. In John Adams' words: 'We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our Constitution was made for a moral and religious people.'

"Freedom requires religion just as religion requires freedom. Freedom opens the windows of the soul so that man can discover his most profound beliefs and commune with God. Freedom and religion endure together, or perish alone.

"Given our grand tradition of religious tolerance and liberty, some wonder whether there are any questions regarding an aspiring candidate's religion that are appropriate. I believe there are. And I will answer them today.

"Almost 50 years ago another candidate from Massachusetts explained that he was an American running for President, not a Catholic running for President. Like him, I am an American running for President. I do not define my candidacy by my religion. A person should not be elected because of his faith nor should he be rejected because of his faith.

"Let me assure you that no authorities of my church, or of any other church for that matter, will ever exert influence on presidential decisions. Their authority is theirs, within the province of church affairs, and it ends where the affairs of the nation begin.

"As Governor, I tried to do the right as best I knew it, serving the law and answering to the Constitution. I did not confuse the particular teachings of my church with the obligations of the office and of the Constitution – and of course, I would not do so as President. I will put no doctrine of any church above the plain duties of the office and the sovereign authority of the law.

"As a young man, Lincoln described what he called America's 'political religion' – the commitment to defend the rule of law and the Constitution. When I place my hand on the Bible and take the oath of office, that oath becomes my highest promise to God. If I am fortunate to become your President, I will serve no one religion, no one group, no one cause, and no one interest. A President must serve only the common cause of the people of the United States.

"There are some for whom these commitments are not enough. They would prefer it if I would simply distance myself from my religion, say that it is more a tradition than my personal conviction, or disavow one or another of its precepts. That I will not do. I believe in my Mormon faith and I endeavor to live by it. My faith is the faith of my fathers – I will be true to them and to my beliefs.

"Some believe that such a confession of my faith will sink my candidacy. If they are right, so be it. But I think they underestimate the American people. Americans do not respect believers of convenience. Americans tire of those who would jettison their beliefs, even to gain the world.

"There is one fundamental question about which I often am asked. What do I believe about Jesus Christ? I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the Savior of mankind. My church's beliefs about Christ may not all be the same as those of other faiths. Each religion has its own unique doctrines and history. These are not bases for criticism but rather a test of our tolerance. Religious tolerance would be a shallow principle indeed if it were reserved only for faiths with which we agree.

"There are some who would have a presidential candidate describe and explain his church's distinctive doctrines. To do so would enable the very religious test the founders prohibited in the Constitution. No candidate should become the spokesman for his faith. For if he becomes President he will need the prayers of the people of all faiths.

"I believe that every faith I have encountered draws its adherents closer to God. And in every faith I have come to know, there are features I wish were in my own: I love the profound ceremony of the Catholic Mass, the approachability of God in the prayers of the Evangelicals, the tenderness of spirit among the Pentecostals, the confident independence of the Lutherans, the ancient traditions of the Jews, unchanged through the ages, and the commitment to frequent prayer of the Muslims. As I travel across the country and see our towns and cities, I am always moved by the many houses of worship with their steeples, all pointing to heaven, reminding us of the source of life's blessings.

"It is important to recognize that while differences in theology exist between the churches in America, we share a common creed of moral convictions. And where the affairs of our nation are concerned, it's usually a sound rule to focus on the latter – on the great moral principles that urge us all on a common course. Whether it was the cause of abolition, or civil rights, or the right to life itself, no movement of conscience can succeed in America that cannot speak to the convictions of religious people.

"We separate church and state affairs in this country, and for good reason. No religion should dictate to the state nor should the state interfere with the free practice of religion. But in recent years, the notion of the separation of church and state has been taken by some well beyond its original meaning. They seek to remove from the public domain any acknowledgment of God. Religion is seen as merely a private affair with no place in public life. It is as if they are intent on establishing a new religion in America – the religion of secularism. They are wrong.

"The founders proscribed the establishment of a state religion, but they did not countenance the elimination of religion from the public square. We are a nation 'Under God' and in God, we do indeed trust.

"We should acknowledge the Creator as did the Founders – in ceremony and word. He should remain on our currency, in our pledge, in the teaching of our history, and during the holiday season, nativity scenes and menorahs should be welcome in our public places. Our greatness would not long endure without judges who respect the foundation of faith upon which our Constitution rests. I will take care to separate the affairs of government from any religion, but I will not separate us from 'the God who gave us liberty.'

"Nor would I separate us from our religious heritage. Perhaps the most important question to ask a person of faith who seeks a political office, is this: does he share these American values: the equality of human kind, the obligation to serve one another, and a steadfast commitment to liberty?

"They are not unique to any one denomination. They belong to the great moral inheritance we hold in common. They are the firm ground on which Americans of different faiths meet and stand as a nation, united.

"We believe that every single human being is a child of God – we are all part of the human family. The conviction of the inherent and inalienable worth of every life is still the most revolutionary political proposition ever advanced. John Adams put it that we are 'thrown into the world all equal and alike.'

"The consequence of our common humanity is our responsibility to one another, to our fellow Americans foremost, but also to every child of God. It is an obligation which is fulfilled by Americans every day, here and across the globe, without regard to creed or race or nationality.

"Americans acknowledge that liberty is a gift of God, not an indulgence of government. No people in the history of the world have sacrificed as much for liberty. The lives of hundreds of thousands of America's sons and daughters were laid down during the last century to preserve freedom, for us and for freedom loving people throughout the world. America took nothing from that Century's terrible wars – no land from Germany or Japan or Korea; no treasure; no oath of fealty. America's resolve in the defense of liberty has been tested time and again. It has not been found wanting, nor must it ever be. America must never falter in holding high the banner of freedom.

"These American values, this great moral heritage, is shared and lived in my religion as it is in yours. I was taught in my home to honor God and love my neighbor. I saw my father march with Martin Luther King. I saw my parents provide compassionate care to others, in personal ways to people nearby, and in just as consequential ways in leading national volunteer movements. I am moved by the Lord's words: 'For I was an hungered, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: naked, and ye clothed me...'

"My faith is grounded on these truths. You can witness them in Ann and my marriage and in our family. We are a long way from perfect and we have surely stumbled along the way, but our aspirations, our values, are the self-same as those from the other faiths that stand upon this common foundation. And these convictions will indeed inform my presidency.

"Today's generations of Americans have always known religious liberty. Perhaps we forget the long and arduous path our nation's forbearers took to achieve it. They came here from England to seek freedom of religion. But upon finding it for themselves, they at first denied it to others. Because of their diverse beliefs, Ann Hutchinson was exiled from Massachusetts Bay, a banished Roger Williams founded Rhode Island, and two centuries later, Brigham Young set out for the West. Americans were unable to accommodate their commitment to their own faith with an appreciation for the convictions of others to different faiths. In this, they were very much like those of the European nations they had left.

"It was in Philadelphia that our founding fathers defined a revolutionary vision of liberty, grounded on self evident truths about the equality of all, and the inalienable rights with which each is endowed by his Creator.

"We cherish these sacred rights, and secure them in our Constitutional order. Foremost do we protect religious liberty, not as a matter of policy but as a matter of right. There will be no established church, and we are guaranteed the free exercise of our religion.

"I'm not sure that we fully appreciate the profound implications of our tradition of religious liberty. I have visited many of the magnificent cathedrals in Europe. They are so inspired ... so grand ... so empty. Raised up over generations, long ago, so many of the cathedrals now stand as the postcard backdrop to societies just too busy or too 'enlightened' to venture inside and kneel in prayer. The establishment of state religions in Europe did no favor to Europe's churches. And though you will find many people of strong faith there, the churches themselves seem to be withering away.

"Infinitely worse is the other extreme, the creed of conversion by conquest: violent Jihad, murder as martyrdom... killing Christians, Jews, and Muslims with equal indifference. These radical Islamists do their preaching not by reason or example, but in the coercion of minds and the shedding of blood. We face no greater danger today than theocratic tyranny, and the boundless suffering these states and groups could inflict if given the chance.

"The diversity of our cultural expression, and the vibrancy of our religious dialogue, has kept America in the forefront of civilized nations even as others regard religious freedom as something to be destroyed.

"In such a world, we can be deeply thankful that we live in a land where reason and religion are friends and allies in the cause of liberty, joined against the evils and dangers of the day. And you can be certain of this: Any believer in religious freedom, any person who has knelt in prayer to the Almighty, has a friend and ally in me. And so it is for hundreds of millions of our countrymen: we do not insist on a single strain of religion – rather, we welcome our nation's symphony of faith.

"Recall the early days of the First Continental Congress in Philadelphia, during the fall of 1774. With Boston occupied by British troops, there were rumors of imminent hostilities and fears of an impending war. In this time of peril, someone suggested that they pray. But there were objections. 'They were too divided in religious sentiments', what with Episcopalians and Quakers, Anabaptists and Congregationalists, Presbyterians and Catholics.

"Then Sam Adams rose, and said he would hear a prayer from anyone of piety and good character, as long as they were a patriot.

"And so together they prayed, and together they fought, and together, by the grace of God ... they founded this great nation.

"In that spirit, let us give thanks to the divine 'author of liberty.' And together, let us pray that this land may always be blessed, 'with freedom's holy light.'

"God bless the United States of America."



TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; election2008; elections; faith; mittromney; mormonism; romney; speech; transcript; tx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: JAKraig; Pride in the USA; Stillwaters
So far I have never heard a politician sound more presidential. This man sounds like a true leader.

Earlier I heard on one of the talk shows that Mr. Romney wrote the entire text of this speech himself. That he made this speech against the wishes of his advisors. It is possible that this speech might sink his run for the presidency but he will have my respect whatever the outcome of the election.

I saw Mitt on Greta's show the other night, and she asked him if he wrote the speech himself; which he said he did. Given the passion and sincerity with which the speech was delivered, I would guess that's true.

I agree with the comments you made about it. Apparently Rush Limbaugh agrees with you as well. He called the speech inspiring, courageous, and demonstrative of leadership. He went on to say that this speech raised the bar on the entire field, and it's the speech he (Rush) has dreamt of hearing from a GOP candidate for a long time.

As Rush said, "It may not be 'Morning in America' yet, but we are much farther from midnight if this keeps up." Very well said.

41 posted on 12/06/2007 11:21:23 AM PST by lonevoice (It's always "Apologize to a Muslim Hour"...somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Elyse

Exactly.


42 posted on 12/06/2007 11:21:36 AM PST by pby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
As Rush said, "It may not be 'Morning in America' yet, but we are much farther from midnight if this keeps up." Very well said.

You gotta love it!

43 posted on 12/06/2007 11:36:00 AM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

At this point Romney has fallen near the bottom of my candidate list.

However, I’m glad to give credit where credit is due — this is a great speech. He threaded the needle very well here in terms of affirming his own faith, explaining what he needed to explain (that he will not be beholden to LDS church leaders), while putting it in the context of America.

Congrats to Romney and his supporters today.


44 posted on 12/06/2007 11:36:33 AM PST by ellery (I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
If anybody can get a transcript of Rush Limbaugh's comments about Governor Romney's speech, I'd really like to see it all in one place. Rush had a lot to say about the speech, spread out primarily at the beginning of his show, at an hour-and-a-half into it, and again at an hour-forty-five into the show. Excellent commentary.

Better yet, or perhaps in addition to, if anyone can rip the relevant audio, I'd love to hear it again.

45 posted on 12/06/2007 11:38:33 AM PST by lonevoice (It's always "Apologize to a Muslim Hour"...somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
You gotta love it!

Yes, I did! I'm often amazed at how eloquent Mr. Limbaugh is when speaking extemporaneously. The comment about 'Morning in America' was a particularly beautiful turn of phrase.

46 posted on 12/06/2007 11:42:31 AM PST by lonevoice (It's always "Apologize to a Muslim Hour"...somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

A “symphony of faith” - I love that.


47 posted on 12/06/2007 11:50:41 AM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elyse

Most Mormons I know who are supporting him are doing so because he shares their values, NOT because they are Mormons. They don’t support Harry Reid, for example, even though he is also a Mormon.

However, it is true that I have not met a Mormon who holds Romney’s faith against him.


48 posted on 12/06/2007 11:52:44 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT (The Swiss Ninja.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

And yet several people who support other candidates have posted in this thread that he just “read what the speechwriters wrote” — with not one piece of evidence supporting their claim.


49 posted on 12/06/2007 11:53:58 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT (The Swiss Ninja.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: pby

Who was the “speechwriter”?


50 posted on 12/06/2007 11:54:19 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT (The Swiss Ninja.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
since he was pro-abortion, pro-homo-marriage and pro-gay-adoption.

For the most part, Romney espoused conservative principals.

Did he occasionally sprinkle in some liberal oriented statements regarding abortion, and homo's? Yes.

But he was far from being a dyed-in-the-wool abortion-supporting homo's-are-great liberal.

Like someone said on the radio today, "if Romney had made some of those statements as elected Governor of a Southern or Mid-western state, then I'd be more concerned.

But considering he made such statements as Governor of the most liberal state in America, then it is not nearly so disconcerting."

Would I rather have Republicans refrain from appeasing the liberal hoardes in Northeastern super liberal states? Yes.

But with politics being what it is, I just don't get THAT upset.

Heck, Ronald Reagan granted AMNESTY to ALL ILLEGALS IN AMERICA in 1986, and he also signed into law the most liberal government-funded abortion law in California in 1967.

Sometimes great leaders do things I find deplorable. But I don't consider them as awful tyrants like many on FR do with Romney.

51 posted on 12/06/2007 11:54:24 AM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Great speech!!!!!!!


52 posted on 12/06/2007 11:54:56 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pby

“leap of faith”

That’s one small leap for Mitt, one giant leap for Mormonkind.

(Don’t blow a fuse.)


53 posted on 12/06/2007 11:55:57 AM PST by tumblindice (GIT OFF ME PA! Yer crushin' mah dam smokes . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Not everyone shares your underwear obsession.

He's covering up this bizarre fetish, not me.

54 posted on 12/06/2007 12:15:44 PM PST by humblegunner (My KungFu is ten times power.©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Romney might have made points with the religious, but lost a lot with me.... Yeah, this is from 2005, but you know what? There’s a lot of ham radio operators out there, millions of us, that won’t vote for him.

Romney “Disses” Amateur Radio In Televised Town Meeting
Posted on Wednesday 16 November 2005 @ 15:48:10

Governor Mitt RomneyGovernor Mitt Romney dismissed the role of Amateur Radio operators in emergency communications during a televised “town meeting” program last night on WCVB’s “When Disaster Strikes: Segment Two.” The program featured public safety and volunteer organization officials from across Massachusetts among its audience.

Host and moderator Natalie Jacobson asked an increasingly-agitated Governor Romney questions about communications interoperability, and communication without commercial power. Romney was next asked by Jacobson, “...so does it come down to ham radio?...”

The Governor replied in a disgusted tone, “No, we don’t need to deal with ham radio operators...”

Embarrassed public safety officials later tried to put in a good word for Amateur Radio. National Weather Service Warning Coordination Meteorologist Glenn Field was prepared to state the importance of Amateur Radio, when Salvation Army Colonel Fred Van Brunt was called upon. Van Brunt remarked about his organization’s quest to improve its communications capabilities and how Amateur Radio has aided his organization. “The ham radio situation helps a great deal,” he stated.

“I have already written and submitted a letter to the Governor’s Office,” wrote Eastern MA Section Emergency Coordinator Rob Macedo, KD1CY. “I have also written an email to Natalie Jacobson.”

ARRL Section Manager Mike Neilsen, W1MPN sent a section-wide email today to all Eastern MA ARRL members describing the incident along with actions he and his staff were taking to mitigate the situation.

“[Romney’s] attitude about us sets an unfortunate tone within the state’s executive branch,” wrote Neilsen. “As a former military officer, I see this as a failure in leadership. My immediate concern is our working relationship within the [Massachusetts Emergency Management Team] environment.” Neilsen intends to address the Governor’s comments as “an urgent matter” at a meeting on November 17 with Don Carlton from the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency.

“I was very disturbed about what the Governor stated on the program,” wrote Ron Wood, W1PLW, the section’s Public Information Coordinator. “It does show that more work is needed by all hams in the section. It’s a great idea to write letters explaining the good we do.” Wood is attempting to schedule a meeting with the Governor’s office tomorrow so that EMA ARRL staffers might discuss the matter further.

Tom Kinahan, N1CPE wrote that Governor Romney’s comment has made “a PR problem” for Kinahan in his role as MA State RACES Officer.

“I’ve got a roster of over 150 Amateur Radio operators that support local communities, and those of us that directly support the state government. There are at least double that in terms of people that are actually out there that I don’t have formal paperwork on that support Amateur Radio emergency communications in some organized manner... The Governor has said that he ‘certainly doesn’t need to rely on ham radio’ — where does that leave the RACES program now?”

“I am ashamed tonight that I am a Republican!” remarked one ham radio viewer. “[Romney] speaks in derogatory tones about hams. He certainly shows an ignorance as to what we do and are capable of. I suggest a grass roots campaign of local hams calling the State House and The Governor’s Office to protest.”

The television program can be viewed at http://www.thebostonchannel.com/video/5334306/detail.html.


55 posted on 12/06/2007 12:16:33 PM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Yep, the left wing Hillary Clinton supporters and minions of the Brown Shirt kind have, like the Nazi’s of 1930’s Germany, made secularism a religion of which they can make their focus.

The correlation between a very small minority of anti-American secular proponents as a religion and those of a minority of German Nazi’s should bother all of America.

In my opinion America has become to tolerant of diverse opinions.

We have allowed traitorous thinking individuals to use this tolerance to stir the American melting pot into a roiling of discontent and hate.

Some of these individuals and groups such as the insignificant New Black Panthers, Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton, Left Wing Democrats, Environmentalists and other American haters have taken advantage of Americas kindness to bash the hand that feeds them.

56 posted on 12/06/2007 12:16:54 PM PST by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Who was the “speechwriter”?

I don't know. Who was?

57 posted on 12/06/2007 12:23:03 PM PST by pby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: JAKraig

I really could care less, mitt needs to go look for some more illegals to do his yard work. LOL


58 posted on 12/06/2007 12:25:04 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Mr. Romney wrote his own speech, he said.


59 posted on 12/06/2007 12:25:50 PM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: pby

His wife Ann said he has been working on it ALONE for several weeks. No speechwriters.


60 posted on 12/06/2007 12:30:15 PM PST by Neenah (Looking for Mr. Smith to come back to Washington !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson