Posted on 12/06/2007 8:44:49 AM PST by traviskicks
Charleston, WV (HNN) An updated listing of Republican delegates who registered for the Feb. 5 statewide Charleston convention has been announced by wvgopconvention.com. The new tally adds some of the registrations that came in by mail. At least one additional update is anticipated.
Mitt Romney leads the committed delegates with 191 followed by Ron Paul at 177, Fred Thompson 157, Mike Huckabee 126, Rudy Giuliani 89, John McCain 25, Duncan Hunter 7, and Alan Keyes 5. A total of 589 delegates are listed as uncommitted.
After all of the delegate registrations are processed, an online vote will be conducted among at-large candidates competing for more spots than there are vacancies. The West Virginia Convention will have a total of 1,446 delegates.
According to online postings, Kanawha County will be highly contested. As of the latest count, 130 delegates will compete for 51 slots in the online balloting. In Cabell County, 50 at-large delegates will be vying for 27 slots.
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ron's weekly message [5 minutes audio, every Monday] • Podcast • Weekly archive • Toll-free 888-322-1414 • |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Free Republic Ron Paul Ping List: Join/Leave |
With 589 uncommitted, it’s still anyone’s race.
Of course it is. We can’t give Ron Paul and credit, can we?
Should have said “any” credit.
What we're expecting is that they'll all get registered and vote! Then we're gonna change the rules and have voting only on the Internet, then we're gonna win! It's pretty amazing, some people think we started off with a plan. Ron Paul, 11-14-07
http://www.boiseweekly.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A308935
Are you kidding me?!? Limited government non interventionist policy?!? Why it's...it's...outright conservative!! And the last thing the Republican party needs is to be reminded there are limited government conservatives (although I think they're in for a rude shock come this election cycle)
yea, and I’ll have to admit, those 500 are probably not too likely to go for Paul... Paul’s supporters are generally pretty hardcore. ‘Undecideds’ I’m not sure we’ll have much luck with... we shall see..
A bit touchy aren’t we? Did I give anyone any “credit”? I didn’t mention Paul at all, why do you feel the need for the snide remarks?
why are you guys still on FR and trying to analyze Ron Paul with critical thinking? Get on the bandwagon and start calling him wacky.
Don’t worget his wacky 9/11 conspiracy theories too - That is what made up my mind about Ron Paul! I would not vote for him for dogcatcher. I question his sanity.
I can see this. He’s probably getting a lot of Robert “Sheets” Byrd supporters.
And don’t forget those who love Texas Wild Shrimp !!!!! Ron Paul proposed lots of government spending to support the Wild Texas Shrimp Industry.
We have to change our foreign policy, and ultimately, that will change their attitude. In the meantime, you treat it for what it is, and you try to keep it in perspective. This is a police matter. They attempted to blow up the towers in the early '90s, and they were caught. They were convicted under all current laws. They didn't need the Patriot Act. They didn't need to violate the civil liberties of every American citizen. It was taken care of. We're dealing with a few people. Of course, since we're doing the wrong thing, there's a lot more enemies out there now.
And displays his firm grasp of history.
I think the lessons of Vietnam are worth looking at. We had to stay there, and we had to win. We lost 60,000. But we use another 60,000 because if we leave, there will be a domino effect, and the communists will take over all of Southeast Asia. But after 20 years of the French and the Americans telling the Vietnamese what to do, they ended up being unified. The wars stopped, and all of a sudden, instead of being communists, they became westernized.
And he's as clear as I've seen him about the neocon takeover of the administration and the government.
The moral consequence should be on those who committed the errors in our foreign policy, but that's about 24 people. It's 24 neoconservatives who took over our foreign policy. They should be responsible, and they don't have to pay for it.
24 neocons took over American foreign policy.
Not 23, not 25, an even two dozen.
Naaah, Paul isn't a conspiracy nut, but it seems to me he has an obligation to name them. The Christian Science Monitor inneocon 101 only outed 12 key neocons
There's another dozen running wild out there!
Who will save the nation!
Yeah, I guess I’m touchy. I apologize.
I wonder if Paul recalls that Iraq was indicted as a co-conspirator in that attack?
Apology accepted. Now you can prepare for battle for the genuinely snide remarks you’re sure to see on this thread.
Good luck!
Honest question...foreign affairs aside, do you think neoconservatism have been a net plus for this country when it comes to domestic issues?
****With 589 uncommitted, its still anyones race.****
Unfortunately, most of the “uncommitted” are old time pols, not a very good source of votes for Ron Paul.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.