1 posted on
12/05/2007 5:12:39 AM PST by
SJackson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: SJackson; EarthBound
36 posted on
12/05/2007 8:31:04 AM PST by
MacDorcha
(We have been at war with this mindset since before the Socratic method was borne.)
To: SJackson
Why am I not surprised there was and continues to be a cover up of mistakes made in the WMD intelligence.
The egotistical government bureaucrats only want to preserve their jobs and will do anything to cover up mistakes they made regarding WMD.
Of course, the MSM has fallen for the no WMD angle hook, line, and sinker. And the Democrats propegate the lies and coverups to make Bush look bad.
Just like the recent intelligence assessment on Iran and their nukes. The report is a very timely report for the Democrats and makes me suspect that a political operative in the intelligence community has deliberately withheld and covered up pertinent facts on the Iran nuke program.
I suspect some of the same people in the Iranian nuke assessment are also involved in the WMD coverup in Iraq.
37 posted on
12/05/2007 9:02:19 AM PST by
o_zarkman44
(No Bull in 08!)
To: SJackson
Oh no! Not this WMD conspiracy thingy again! </ sarcasm>(wink)
39 posted on
12/05/2007 11:15:50 AM PST by
beachn4fun
(With the holidays fast approaching, remember the deployed troops. A care package shows you care.)
To: SJackson
It is being openly said that the Israelis are keeping quiet about their Syrian raid on Saddam's stockpile
This is the first I heard that that the raid on Syria was to destroy Saddam's stockpile. Why am I always the last to know ?
What troubles me...by the time Saddam moved his WMD's to Syria via convoy, the U.S. had already decided it was going to attack.
It seems to me that satellite photos should have covered Iraq and surrounding states 24/7.
Should we have seen these convoys ?
To: SJackson
On the one hand, the bureaucrats have banned further public access to the Saddam files because too much genuine information was emerging on how to build an A-Bomb. At the same time, Negroponte has been telling people that there is no evidence of any WMD programs in the Iraqi files. They cant have it both ways. They cant re-classify the Saddam files because they give out too much info on WMD, and then deny that the Saddam files have any WMD evidence. Marxists are all about having it both ways. After all their entire theory is based on withering away the large state by making it even larger. If you can con anarchists into accepting communism, you can con people into accepting that proof of evidence is lack of evidence.
To: SJackson
52 posted on
12/06/2007 11:14:09 PM PST by
Captain Beyond
(The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
To: SJackson
53 posted on
12/06/2007 11:29:05 PM PST by
Randy Larsen
(I'M WITH FRED!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson