Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Truth About "Alternative Energy"
Townhall.com ^ | December 5, 2007 | Roy Innis

Posted on 12/05/2007 12:26:54 AM PST by gpapa

Every week brings new claims that clean, free, inexhaustible renewable energy will soon replace the “dirty” fuels that sustain our economy today. A healthy dose of reality is needed.

Over half of our electricity comes from coal. Gas and nuclear generate 36% of our electricity. Barely 1% comes from wind and solar. Coal-generated power typically costs less per kilowatt hour than alternatives – leaving families with more money for food, housing, transportation and healthcare.

By 2020, the United States will need 100,000 megawatts of new electricity, say EIA, industry and utility company analysts. Unreliable wind power simply cannot meet these demands.

Wind farms require subsidies and vast stretches of land. To meet New York City’s electricity needs alone would require blanketing the entire state of Connecticut with towering turbines, according to Rockefeller University Professor Jesse Ausubel. They kill raptors and other birds, and must be backed up by expensive coal or gas power plants that mostly sit idle – but kick in whenever the wind dies down, so factories, schools, offices and homes don’t shut down.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: altenergy; alternativeenergy; altfuels; coal; energy; energypolicy; fuels; nuclear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 12/05/2007 12:26:56 AM PST by gpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gpapa

The enviornmentalist does’nt want solutions.

They want us to die.

Bring on the coal, oil and nuclear!


2 posted on 12/05/2007 1:03:32 AM PST by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

I don’t even remember when the last nuclear power plant was built.


3 posted on 12/05/2007 1:35:35 AM PST by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiMark

Indiana is dependent on good ole coal for most of our electricity......we’ve developed clean burning technologies over the years and we have clear skies to prove it. Bring on COAL, MORE DRILLING, AND NUCLEAR PLANTS; we can beat the foreign oil dependency with no problem (as long as the government stays out of our way).


4 posted on 12/05/2007 1:35:59 AM PST by raisincane (Dims think we're all oblivious to the obvious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChiMark

>> [The environmentalists] want us to die.

True... but not right away! First, they want us to worship them, and fill their coffers with our hard-earned dough...


5 posted on 12/05/2007 1:40:19 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Retire Ron Paul! Support Chris Peden (www.chrispeden.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

By 2020, the United States will need 100,000 megawatts of new electricity, say EIA, industry and utility company analysts-—————————————————————————I’m thinking this puppy will suffice at 500,000,000 WATTS. Yep, that’s FIVE HUNDRED MILLION ! watts by 2016: “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER";


6 posted on 12/05/2007 1:50:15 AM PST by CheezyChesster (failed diplomacy: IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY STUPID !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westlander

I think the last ones finished in the US were the two reactors at Comanche Peak in Texas.

However, the nuclear utilities are getting their paperwork together to apply for more. I’ll see you there.


7 posted on 12/05/2007 2:33:48 AM PST by wolfpat (If you don't like the Patriot Act, you're really gonna hate Sharia Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CheezyChesster
ITER will be designed to produce approximately 500 MW (500,000,000 watts) of fusion power sustained for up to 400 seconds...

Where are they going to store it?

8 posted on 12/05/2007 2:44:28 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Westlander
I don’t even remember when the last nuclear power plant was built.

Are you kidding? ... Dozens ar under construction at this very moment. It's just that they're in China rather than the US.

9 posted on 12/05/2007 3:08:56 AM PST by The Duke (I have met the enemy, and he is named 'Apathy'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

This is an excellent article...everyone should read it.


10 posted on 12/05/2007 4:13:40 AM PST by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CheezyChesster

IEC fusion (Bussard) is better.


11 posted on 12/05/2007 4:24:36 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gpapa
Preeminent alarmists Al Gore and Hillary Clinton emit more CO2 in a week from the private jets they take to campaign, lecture and fund-raising events, than the average American does in a year. And yet they’re demanding a wholesale “transformation” of our economy and living standards.

bump for later

12 posted on 12/05/2007 4:43:17 AM PST by alrea (Can Edwards Hsu?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa
We cannot generate electricity with hot air from politicians eager to create tax breaks, subsidies and “renewable energy mandates” for companies that produce alternative energy technologies – in exchange for campaign contributions from those companies.

climate hysteria hustle

13 posted on 12/05/2007 4:44:23 AM PST by alrea (Can Edwards Hsu?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

If we need more energy to keep up with the population explosion, just get rid of 38 million Illegals and keep legal immigration in check until we develop more energy.


14 posted on 12/05/2007 4:50:44 AM PST by Haddit (Hunter is still the Best)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

Good Post. This needed to be said. The treehuggers prohibit coal and nuke plants while increasing their purchase of electric devices. They belong to the Dementia party (they call it Democrat, though).


15 posted on 12/05/2007 4:57:46 AM PST by RoadTest ("It is time for thee, LORD, to work: for they have made void thy law. - Psalm 119:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Duke

The really ironic thing is that the French, the bastion of liberal thought, has it’s power grid powered by over 70 percent nuclear power.


16 posted on 12/05/2007 4:58:25 AM PST by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gpapa
Each day, although it is not reclaimable, the earth receives 174 X 1015 watts of energy from the sun. The world currently uses about 13 X 1012 watts of energy each year. The amount of DAILY solar energy is 13000 TIMES (13 X 103) MORE than the ANNUAL amount of energy consumed. It is a SHAME that more of that energy is not recoverable. Obviously, one can't cover every square meter of the earth with solar collectors. However, there are significant areas of improvement in how we do everything from building our buildings to improving our technologies that would assist us in using some of that energy. I'm a clean coal advocate myself, but, I'm in favor of saving any single drop of energy I can without injuring lifestyle, rather than buy it from the middle east.
17 posted on 12/05/2007 5:06:10 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain! True Supporters of Our Troops Support the Necessity of their Sacrifice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

Dig up clean Western coal and start burning a lot more of it. It burns very cleanly today with modern technology. Make lots of electricity and severely limit oil and gas fired plants. Coal generated electric can also be used to power electric cars and to make hydrogen for hydrogen powered cars

Anyone have an estimate of the cost of running a hydrogen car on coal generated electricity? Whether it’s competitive at $90/barrel oil. I’ll bet it competes at $70 oil


18 posted on 12/05/2007 5:12:02 AM PST by dennisw (Islam - "a transnational association of dangerous lunatics")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Dig up clean Western coal and start burning a lot more of it. It burns very cleanly today with modern technology. Make lots of electricity and severely limit oil and gas fired plants. Coal generated electric can also be used to power electric cars and to make hydrogen for hydrogen powered cars

Dig up the coal and turn it into oil. Get our electricity from Nuclear. Subsidise electric cars. Encourage China to do the same. Clean skys and no more money going to the Arabs.

19 posted on 12/05/2007 5:18:11 AM PST by Politically Correct (A member of the rabble in good standing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CheezyChesster
I’m thinking this puppy will suffice at 500,000,000 WATTS. Yep, that’s FIVE HUNDRED MILLION ! watts by 2016

So what. A large coal/nuclear plant can easily produce 1-2 Gigawatts. And that's sustained power over a long period.

I think you just confused watts and megawatts. 500,000,000 watts is 500 megawatts and 0.5 gigawatts. 100,000 megawatts is 100 billion watts and 100 gigawatts.

20 posted on 12/05/2007 5:28:16 AM PST by varyouga ("Rove is some mysterious God of politics & mind control" - DU 10-24-06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson