What am I missing? He asserts that the Big Bang was a white hole, the opposite of a black hole. That the Universe was created from the outside inwards and that the reason the earth is only 10,000 years old is because it has been traveling at relativistic speeds while the rest of the universe has been traveling much slower and thus aging much faster.
What have I got wrong?
And no, he definately does not say that it was created "from the outside inwards;" he clearly describes a sphere of liquid water as being the beginning state of all matter. Further, he does not have the Earth in any motion other than local angular motion, because it is at or near the center of the original mass. It is the rest of the universe, expanded away from the Earth, that creates an illusion of overall great age. That is to say, that space itself is expanding, or possibly expanded in the past but now being constant in size, not just objects moving apart in space. Humphries' universe is also necessarily bounded, and surrounded by water.