To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
BBC cannot just report this good news. They simply MUST include the unrelated reports of civilian casualties. Twice.
4 posted on
12/04/2007 10:44:50 AM PST by
Spruce
To: Spruce
"BBC cannot just report this good news. They simply MUST include the unrelated reports of civilian casualties. Twice." Yup. I 'caught' that too. Sickening liberal news organizations.
9 posted on
12/04/2007 10:48:52 AM PST by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: Spruce
They have to end their articles on a positive note. /s
10 posted on
12/04/2007 10:54:01 AM PST by
Stonewall Jackson
(The Hunt for FRed November. 11/04/08)
To: Spruce
They simply MUST include the unrelated reports of civilian casualties. Twice. Yes, they're so very desperate for things like that these days. They are despairing that there aren't more incidents like that to report.
They really are pathetic and self-serving to the point of being evil.
23 posted on
12/04/2007 12:12:16 PM PST by
Allegra
(Greetings from a kinder, gentler Iraq. God bless US and Coalition Forces.)
To: Spruce
I saw CNN report some weeks ago that coupled good news out of Iraq with a “meanwhile things aren’t going well in Afghanistan” story.
If they were in business back then, their coverage the day of Germany’s surrender would have been all about “devastating U.S. casualties in the Pacific”.
30 posted on
12/04/2007 9:45:28 PM PST by
Dagnabitt
(Undocumented Voters for Huckabee - Si se puede!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson